Kathryn Sikkink’s “The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions Are Changing World Politics”
By Micheline Ishay,
What is the impact of putting former national leaders on trial for massive violations of human rights? Surely, most who are aware of the crimes, and certainly the surviving victims, find value in the trials and convictions of murderous leaders and their associates. On the other hand, there are cases in which such prosecutions may forestall healing; few, for example, have questioned Nelson Mandela’s decision not to seek criminal trials for the former leaders of South African apartheid.
Until Kathryn Sikkink’s remarkable new book, most treatments of this issue scrutinized the unique features of particular cases. In “Justice Cascade,” however, Sikkink, who teaches political science at the University of Minnesota, goes beyond earlier studies to ask whether one can draw general conclusions from surveying all of the cases. She makes two strong arguments in favor of such trials: first, that holding former leaders legally accountable strengthens the prospects for successful transitions to democracy; and, second, that there is a cascade effect: as such trials become the norm worldwide, violators are left with few places to run. Thus, trying high-ranking violators of international law may be the best deterrent against such crimes in the future.
(Norton) - ‘The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions Are Changing World Politics’ by Kathryn Sikkink
“Justice Cascade” also provides riveting accounts of specific human rights prosecutions against deposed dictators in Europe, Latin America and Africa. Though the book was completed before the Arab uprising, the timing of its publication is certainly propitious. The specter of a new wave of prosecutions — either in the home country or in some international tribunal — hangs over the heads of former leaders Ben Ali of Tunisia, Hosni Mubarak of Egypt and the still-struggling Bashar al-Assad of Syria, along with some of their family members and associates.
Sikkink argues against skeptics who see such prosecutions and trials as spectacular shams that lead to neither real justice nor peace. She maintains that the proliferation of human rights prosecutions in Latin America, Europe and Africa has become a powerful tool for facilitating democratic transitions and preventing leaders elsewhere from undertaking brutal human rights violations. Armed with empirical data, she argues that Latin America — thanks to the widespread use of trials — has achieved a better record of democratization and human rights than Eastern Europe, the former U.S.S.R., Asia or Africa. In this way, she undercuts the argument that countries should postpone holding trials until after they have consolidated their transitions to democracy. For Sikkink, early decisions to launch trials in Argentina, Guatemala and Peru dramatized the arrival of a new order and may have prevented anti-democratic challenges.
Sikkink then turns to the Bush administration’s reinterpretations of laws regarding what constitutes torture and the rights of accused terrorists. The common view is that those officials have escaped all legal repercussions for the abuses of prisoners at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo, or the transfer of suspects to countries such as Egypt, where they faced torture. In fact, Sikkink explains how, as more and more countries conclude that human rights abuses should be prosecuted, former senior officials such as former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld have learned that they are no longer immune from prosection and may risk arrest when traveling outside the United States.
This commenter is a Washington Post contributor. Post contributors aren’t staff, but may write articles or columns. In some cases, contributors are sources or experts quoted in a story.
Comments our editors find particularly useful or relevant are displayed in Top Comments, as are comments by users with these badges: . Replies to those posts appear here, as well as posts by staff writers.
To pause and restart automatic updates, click "Live" or "Paused". If paused, you'll be notified of the number of additional comments that have come in.
Comments our editors find particularly useful or relevant are displayed in Top Comments, as are comments by users with these badges: . Replies to those posts appear here, as well as posts by staff writers.
Loading...
Comments