TV review: State of the Union, real enough

One of the more exhausted punditry metaphors of the 2012 campaign is to compare the GOP race to a “reality show,” especially when it comes to the mind-numbing number of televised debates that have pared down the Republican field. (How many debates at this point, not counting the one Donald Trump had to cancel? Forty or so? Only 18? Seems like more.)

Reality TV is an image only Washington’s political junkies, who are always in search of a way to juice up their subject matter, could have landed on. And, frankly, it demeans reality TV. Do they mean politics is like “Celebrity Wife Swap” or “The Sing-Off” or “Deadliest Catch”? Or all of it? Those who say it obviously haven’t watched enough reality TV to tell.

Video

Get the highlights from President Obama's State of the Union speech in less than a minute. (Jan. 24)

Get the highlights from President Obama's State of the Union speech in less than a minute. (Jan. 24)

Graphic

INTERACTIVE: State of the Union breakdown
Click Here to View Full Graphic Story

INTERACTIVE: State of the Union breakdown

Looking for things to do?
Select one or more criteria to search
Get ideas

More on this Story

View all Items in this Story

Nevertheless, people keep framing this bitterly born election season as part of the reality genre. ABC kicked off its broadcast of President Obama’s State of the Union address Tuesday night with the graphics and language that would accompany a reality-style showdown, in which a long rumored comeback (that would be the president’s) finally takes center stage. ABC started with grainy images of the Republicans attacking the president’s record.

“Can he rally our country and our government in the middle of an election year?” the narrator wondered in reality’s unmistakable tone of hype, boxing rings, movie trailers. Keywords flashed across the screen — programming for airheads. “Now! Tonight . . . 

But the Obama who spoke for an hour-plus Tuesday was still the grown-up, nobly uninterested in entertainment and touching on far too many bullet points that tested a viewer’s remaining slivers of attention span.

It was a good speech. “A great speech,” Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton assured the president when it was over, overheard on camera. The speech reached the length of some of the epic addresses her husband used to give in the 1990s.

Drone has dual meanings now, and the president droned. We know that Obama gives good speeches. But we also know, three years in, that some of this president’s most impressive moments on television (whether by “SOTU” or in one of his exasperated acts of oratory that accompany a political standoff) have a way of fading too quickly in the distance. His sound bites can look great on paper when the embargoed text lands in our BlackBerrys, and it will even sound fine in the moment and then . . . the speech fades, never to be requoted beyond the news cycle. It’s a strange failure in someone so naturally gifted with the essential elements of the spotlight and the microphone.

Still, this was the speech meant to predicate all the campaigning ahead (read: TV appearances and interviews and stumps), the reelection Obama must now embark on. In some ways, these are always the most anticipated SOTUs, the first appeal for a renewed relationship between a president and the electorate. The last time we needed to be charmed this way was by President George W. Bush, in 2004.

A viewer’s overwhelming impression Tuesday night is that of a president who can, for the most part, claim more credit than he will ever get from even his sanest critics: Osama bin Laden is dead, and General Motors lives; the troops are home from Iraq; ghastly unemployment numbers are abating — or many of the unemployed finally vanished from our statistical periphery. Some of the things are working some of the time. Whatever he’s done, it’s somehow never enough.

Loading...

Comments

Add your comment
 
Read what others are saying About Badges