The story of both Julie Powell (Amy Adams), a government employee who decides to cook her way through Julia Child's classic French cookbook, and Julia Child (Meryl Streep), as she begins to find her own way in the culinary world.
Drama
Meryl Streep, Amy Adams, Jane Lynch, Stanley Tucci
Nora Ephron
2:04
Opened Nov 26, 2009
I've already seen it twice and am returning for a third viewing - with my husband this time. The parallel stories worked for me. Julia was larger than life and icon with a capital "I." Julie was meant to be insipid. She wanted to change who she was and ultimately transforms her life through hard work and perseverance. Not perfect, but highly entertaining. Streep is perfection!
Ms. Hornaday has failed to separate the performance from the character. The Julia story is about a famous, larger than life character taking place in the beauty/charm of posh late 40's Paris/Europe. The Julie story is about an "ordinary" woman leading a mundane/very unglamorous life in post 9/11 NYC. If Ms. Hornaday were living in that tiny apartment in its bleak surroundings, I suspect she would be a whiny sad sack as well. This charming and interestingly told film succeeds due the equality of each story and how, despite their differences, they intertwine over both the joy of cooking and writing about it. That is the heart and point of this entertaining movie, you don’t have to be a celebrity to find the “joy in cooking.”
The Julia half of the movie is superb. Tucci is perfect as the foil to Streep, who is at the absolute top of her game. The Julie half is a bit insipid; as if someone forgot to put the bouquet garni in the stew. The boeuf bourguignon sequence has the suspense of a Disney movie and the answering machine "climax" is simply trite. Not sure if it was the script, the acting, or the direction but this half of the souffle was a blintz.
This is a rare gem of a movie which has a story (actually, two, actors who can act, and roles which allow each to shine. Streep is NOT portraying Julia Child, she is portraying the Julia imagined by Julie--and this characterization is flawless, as she is Julie's idol. Streep "got" that, captures Julia herself precisely, and Julie(Amy Adams) is also brilliant playing a real, flawed person seeking something...Tucci--wow--he is magnificent as is Amy's spouse...perfectly cast and directed--amazing film. Do NOT miss this on the big screen, for France shots, especially...
Ann Hornaday needs us all to think she is discriminating. And 'discriminating' people always find fault.
Did Ann Hornaday see a different movie? It was wonderful seeing Julia Child's life develop over a period of years but also to see Julie's life change over her "cooking" year as a counterpoint. I am always amazed at how Meryl Streep can be such different characters in her films when so many actresses seem to just be themselves in every movie.
I enjoyed “Julie&Julia” greatly. So the editorial review came as a surprise. As adorable as Meryl Streep’s character is, she is hardly a believable person. Julie is far easier to connect with, because she is someone you might actually know in real life. Do you think real Julia never had a self-pitying detour on her journey? Never had a fight with her husband? Never felt like crying on the kitchen floor? I doubt it. Julie might very well be lost and self-absorbed, but she is searching, moving, learning. And it took Julia 40+ years to find HER true calling. Maybe not everyone has what it takes to become an American icon, but it does not mean that anyone is denied their own quest for purpose and some sense in their lives.
Saw this lovely movie on Saturday night with a Tween daughter in a theatre filled with grandparents, middle-aged couples and Tween grandaughters. Fabulous movie marred by pre-show trailers: 2012, Step-father and Lovely Bones at a National Amusements Multiplex. These trailers depict the catastrophic end of the world; a serial murderer step-parent, and a murdered Tween speaking from the grave. (Yikes!) It is a shame to have to see all that before you're permitted to enjoy the richness that is Juile and Julia. So,CAUTION -- avoid seeing it at a National Amusments location -- you'll be too shocked to enjoy J&J fully. Shared disappointment with National Amusements about showing such unrated violent trailers b4 PG13. Answer: Too bad for you
I wrote an earlier review that appears to have been removed, perhaps because I wondered at Ms. Homaday's skills at reviewing movies. I still wonder at that, as she so clearly failed to "get" this movie. This was not strictly a Julia Child biopic; while a delightful woman, her impact on the lives of women in the US in the 1960s is the reason that Child was so beloved, and the reason Nora Ephron simply had to have Julie as counterpoint. Never did Julia seem more attractive than when reflected in the love and reverence of Julie. I found both "sides" of this story enchanting and each necessary for the other to succeed. I just don't "get" Ms. Homaday's point, I suppose. See this movie: you will thoroughly enjoy it (as has everyone I know).
Great performance by Streep, terrific acting & impersonation.
Seeing Julie having an attack onto the floor reminded me of how tired I would get when my children were young and I would be cooking many times from Julia Childs cookbooks. Also was good to see how ridiculous it looked to others especially ones husband. Both performances are great and tho another movie might be fun on just Julia Child life we enjoyed this movie a lot and the audience clapped at the end! Does anyone know if Julia Childs ever read these blogs or just heard of them and commented for sure? Seems to me she would've been flattered.
Julie Child was nearly 40 when she started taking classes at the Cordon Bleu, and just about 50 when her cookbook was published, not in her 30's as the review states. So it's not that far off to have a 60 year old Meryl Streep playing the part. I enjoyed both parts of the movie. As much as I loved Julia Child, I'm not sure a movie just about Child would have worked. When the movie took a detour into Julia Child's family life, it slowed down - as amusing as Jane Lynch was, I didn't really care about Julia Child's sister and wasn't sure why that was in the movie. If they'd had another hour to fill, they either would have included a lot more family stories like that, or extended the movie to cover her work on TV (which would have been fun
It would be nice, since you seem to like Meryl Streep, to KNOW her age before you paint her as an "actress in her mid 60s." Meryl Streep turned 6-0 less than a month ago. And after her hilarious turn last summer in Mamma Mia, I think we all know age is of no significance when it comes to a classic Streep performance.
What a good film it would have been better if it had just been about Julia Child & her husband/family.
Ephron hits the tone of our times just right, it's evolution from self-confidence and self-respect to self-absorption and self-pity. Well done, and intelligently reviewed.
Thank you for submitting a review. Please check back soon.
You have chosen to submit a user review for possible removal by our editorial staff due to its offensive or inappropriate nature. Please confirm that you would like the review submitted for evaluation. If our editors find that the review does not fall within our user review guidelines, then it will be removed promptly.
Thanks, for your thoughts!
To see the review, refresh your page. Please remember that washingtonpost.com
reserves the right to remove a review without any warning if it does not
satisfy WPNI Rules for Posting Content.
The user review that you selected has been submitted for evaluation by our editors. It usually takes us about 5-7 days to evaluate a review.
Thanks for the notification!