Carolyn Hax
Carolyn Hax
Columnist

The hurt of being erased from family history

Carolyn Hax

Carolyn Hax started her advice column in 1997 as a weekly feature for The Washington Post, accompanied by the work of “relationship cartoonist” Nick Galifianakis. She is the author of “Tell Me About It” (Miramax, 2001), and the host of a live online discussion on Fridays at noon.

Archive

(Nick Galifianakis)

You might also like...

She the People

EMILY’s List powering Democratic women fundraising totals

EMILY’s List powering Democratic women fundraising totals

EMILY’s List, a progressive group that backs women who support abortion rights, is emerging as a powerhouse fundraiser this cycle.

More

My ex remarried and had a child, now 5; we don’t live in the same town. My ex and I are the parents of a 20-something.

I just learned that my ex and the new spouse have never told the 5-year-old that I exist; the child thinks the parents are the only set.

Shouldn’t a 5-year-old know something by now? I know it’s not my child’s place to have said anything, especially when specifically told not to do so, but why does this hurt my feelings so much?

Invisible Woman

You’ve been erased. Of course that hurts.

But it doesn’t sound personal at all, given the information you’ve supplied; it’s just cowardly. It’s hard to explain adult complexities to kids, so these parents punted.

It’ll cost them more the longer they prop up this lie. Their child will find out, obviously, and have that eureka moment: “They lied to me about this, so how can I believe anything they say?” The lie will also damage the relationship between the siblings.

Again, it’s not a personal issue for you, since this is their family to mess up run as they please. And I firmly believe their choice says nothing about your character but speaks harshly of theirs.

I also strongly disagree that it wasn’t your child’s place to say anything. The high road, when “specifically told” to stay quiet, was this: “I refuse to deceive a child for you. I won’t offer any information, but also won’t lie when asked.”

So much distress could be preempted by refusing these “Don’t tell . . .” deals. Fortunately, the “I won’t lie for you” line can be drawn at any point, slightly amended to, “I’m sorry I agreed to cover for you, and I won’t do it anymore.”

Re: Invisible Woman:

Are you just supposed to randomly mention that the older sibling has a third parent? I wouldn’t know how to start that conversation with a 5-year-old. I have an almost 4-year-old myself, and while I know a year is a long time in terms of development, I really don’t think she’d get it. She doesn’t even grasp that she has four grandparents because one died before she was born. Even when we try to talk about him, she just doesn’t seem to grasp that he’s her grandpa.

This seems like something best covered when the child gets older and asks questions rather than throwing it at them unprovoked.

Anonymous

Don’t “start a conversation,” just mention the fact of it. “Sheila’s your mom, but mine — my mother lives in Phoenix.” Just facts, no puff or embellishment. Understanding is for later. A child who wants an explanation will ask for it.

Once the fact is out, then you let the child grow into awareness in age-appropriate ways. Usually that occurs through the child’s questions as s/he matures. Answer each query with the fact requested. Again, children who want longer answers will ask follow-up questions.

That’s a lot easier on everyone than info lockdown followed by a later-date revelation, one that forces little people to grasp that the history they used to define themselves was not only false, but also fed to them by parents eager to cover their [tracks].

Write to Carolyn Hax, Style, 1150 15th St. NW, Washington, D.C. 20071, or tellme@washpost.com. Sign up for Carolyn Hax’s column, delivered to your inbox early each morning, at http://bit.ly/haxpost.

 
Read what others are saying