Meanwhile, online booksellers were changing the dynamics of book-buying.
Algorithms that track customers viewing and buying habits (“Customers who bought this book also bought . . .”), the explosion of bestseller lists in specific categories (history, biography, thrillers, sports) , online reader reviews, the catologues that enable readers to see an author’s other books — all began giving readers more options and information than they ever had before.
And many indie authors started doing something publishers would never do: Giving books away for free in an effort to lure readers to check them out. “They know once they get readers hooked, they’ll pay for the rest of their books or the rest of a series,” says Coker at Smashwords.
That pricing has been crucial to the explosion in sales, indie authors say.
Readers may balk at shelling out $23.95 for a hardcover or even $12.95 for a trade paperback. But, it has turned out, mid-list authors who don’t have success at those prices may be runaway bestsellers at, say, $2.99.
Because royalties paid for e-books range from 35 to 70 percent (compared to 15 percent or so on paperback and hardcover titles), and because self-published writers don’t have to pay an agent (typically another 15 percent bite out of their profits), these little-known but self-published writers can take home about $2 on that $2.99 title — nearly double what they would earn on that $12.95 paperback.
Think price and format don’t matter?
Konrath, the guy knocking down $78,000 in six weeks, wrote a techno-thriller in 1999 called “The List.” No publisher wanted it. He self published it in 2009, in print and digital editions.
At 2:45 p.m. March 24, the e-book was at No. 50 on the Kindle paid bestseller list, selling at $2.99, with 28 days on the list. His Kindle account shows he sold 3,771 copies that week at that price.
On the same day, the same book was offered in paperback at $13.95 on Amazon’s books page. It was ranked 102,526.
Eisler, the thriller writer who turned down the $500,000 contract, is another convert to digital indie publishing.
The dynamic of book purchasing is proving to be vastly different for e-readers than it is in the bricks-and-mortar world of bookstores, he says.
Eisler’s theory, which is widely shared in the field, holds that a typical bookstore browser might pick out six or seven books they want, but the sheer weight and the price of such purchases causes them to winnow their selections to one or two. There’s also the mental block of having stacks of unread books at home.
But digital sales are convincing him that online purchasing behavior is different — people can buy six books for, say, $20, and have nothing to weigh them down while shopping in the mall or getting on a plane.
“The price is so low, the gratification is so instant, and there no ‘to be read’ pile about to tip over on your night table,” he says. “The limiting factor isn’t time or cost. It’s interest. In a paper world, shelves can only hold so much, towns can only support so many bookstores.”
“Low-priced digital,” he says, “is just a completely different animal.”
Godin has been in publishing and marketing for two decades. He’s sold on the idea that digital is the new frontier. But, he says, the success stories — Hocking, Konrath, Belleville — have spent years writing, blogging, communicating with readers online and building their audiences one painstaking member at a time. “You have to earn [an audience],” he says. “You can’t buy it. It’s not for sale.”
Belleville, for example, had saved every piece of fan mail from readers who liked her most popular book, “Take Me.” When she wrote the digital-only sequel, “Love Me,” last summer, she wrote the news to every person who had written her about the original. Then there was the blogging, the newsletter on her Web sites, her Facebook pages, her Twitter accounts and so on.
In between, she writes as much as 6,000 words per day for her novels. That’s nearly 20 pages in standard hardcover format.
“I am working,” she says, “harder than I ever have in my life.”
A good story is key
The day after putting together her latest book cover, Belleville gets up just after dawn to drive an hour and a half to Berkeley to speak to the local chapter of the Romance Writers of America.
Despite her wild success in the past year, she doesn’t think that print publishers are going anywhere, and she doesn’t want them to. Last spring, while her digital books were beginning to take off, she got word from her agent that her Adirondacks trilogy under the name “Bella Riley” had sold to a new print publishing house — for a modest $7,500 per book. She was geeked out about that, too.
Meanwhile, the grand dame of her pseudonyms, Bella Andre, has been dramatically rescued from an untimely demise, even without an alpha male in sight. She’s selling terrifically online, and Belleville has mapped out an eight-book Andre series.
The Romance Writers meeting is a loud, spirited talk shop of about 25 women in an upstairs room of the Pyramid Breweries Alehouse. Writers announce their latest adventures in publishing, and Belleville and two friends give a short workshop on creating alpha male heroes.
There’s the swashbuckling alpha, the wounded alpha, the bad-boy alpha, the extreme alpha, the chief alpha, the gentle alpha and, of course, the warrior alpha. Your alpha can be a dominant guy, they say, but his love interest has to be a strong woman, too, or else he’d just be overbearing. The heroine, in fact, is almost always the one chink in his armor.
“One thing alphas do not say,” Belleville says, “is ‘I don’t know what to do.’ ” To connote her heroes’ take-charge manner, she’ll cut the first word or two out of his dialogue; “Are you going to town?” becomes “Going to town?”
It’s an odd little moment in the breakout days of one of the hottest digital writers in America: During her presentation, there was almost no talk about digital publishing. The discussion was just about stories and why readers like some characters and don’t like others, the dynamics between men and women, and what they find moving and worthwhile in literature.
It was almost like 1995.
Loading...
Comments