Business and civic groups in Virginia and Maryland issued a report this month that challenges the D.C. region to decide what transportation programs are most needed to ease congestion.
This is not how governments and commuters think.
Business and civic groups in Virginia and Maryland issued a report this month that challenges the D.C. region to decide what transportation programs are most needed to ease congestion.
This is not how governments and commuters think.
Governments have lists of transportation projects to accomplish many goals within their jurisdictions. Congestion relief is only one. Among the other goals are the creation of new travel options, economic development and neighborhood revitalization.
Commuters have lists of projects that would improve their routes to work. The lists might include fixing potholes, retiming traffic signals or adding a left-turn lane, or something slightly more elaborate, like double-decking the Capital Beltway. The lists are usually very personal.
Despite the widespread awareness that traffic congestion hurts people financially, physically and emotionally, there is no widespread discussion of a regional investment program that would set a few top priorities and get them done.
Congestion busting
The new report was done by two business groups, the Northern Virginia Transportation Alliance and the Maryland Suburban Transportation Alliance, for a regional association called the 2030 Group. The two alliances say they picked 45 transportation professionals — traffic engineers, transportation administrators, civil engineers, designers and urban planners — for interviews, and then used the results to fashion their report.
Downside: The survey aspect of the report is difficult to assess. The interviewees were selected by the business groups, the interviews were confidential and the resulting recommendations are very much in the mainstream of what business leaders have endorsed in recent years.
Upside: Just because the transportation recommendations emerge from business groups doesn’t mean the ideas are bad or unworthy of discussion. The region has taken very seriously the ideas on Metro governance put forward last year by the Greater Washington Board of Trade. The key things to take from the new report are its insistence that we need to develop a short list of projects that will have a big impact on congestion within the lifetime of today’s commuters, as well as a proposal on priorities to discuss.
A planning method
The report challenges us to define what we mean when we say we have a transportation problem and then focus on the most effective ways to address it.
“The prioritization process should focus heavily on highway and transit investments that do the most to reduce travel times/delays, reduce congestion, and improve transportation network safety and reliability,” the report concludes. And the process for making choices must be “more regional and professional and less parochial, political and ideologically driven.”
A priority list
The alliances asked each of the experts they selected to name the single most important regional transportation investment in the next 20 years. These were among the top choices cited:
l Build new Potomac River bridges.
l Preserve the Metro system.
l Create a regional network of express toll lanes and bus rapid transit lanes.
The Post MostMost-viewed stories, videos, and galleries in the past two hours
Live Q&A, Friday 11 a.m. ET
The 2012 Post Hunt -- a wild contest of brainteasing puzzles -- kicks off on Sunday, June 3 in downtown Washington, D.C.
| 11:00 AM | Real Wheels Live |
|---|---|
| 11:00 AM | The Fix Live |
| 11:00 AM | 2012 Post Hunt: Are you ready? |
| 12:00 PM | Carolyn Hax Live: Advice columnist tackles your problems (Friday, June 1) |
Loading...
Comments