Daniel Choi, opponent of ‘don’t ask’ policy, found guilty in White House protest

More crime and safety news

Man found fatally shot inside Northeast Washington home

The incident happened in the Queens Chapel area of Northeast DC.

Bodies of two men found under I-295

Bodies of two men found under I-295

D.C. police find no signs of foul play. Cause of death has yet to be determined, but hypothermia is being considered.

Restaurateur, son plead guilty to offering bribes

Restaurateur, son plead guilty to offering bribes

The pair, known in Chinatown, tried to pay public officials in order to get licenses for a new taxicab company.

Read more

Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola said his finding was consistent with the First Amendment because of the “radically different” approach of Choi and 12 others who refused to follow orders to leave the area in front of the White House.

Choi was discharged from the military for violating its ban on gays in the military and became one of the leading activists against the policy that President Obama formally repealed the month after his arrest.

But in court on Thursday, Choi’s erratic demeanor swung from emotional outbursts at the lectern to belligerent confrontations with a U.S. Park Police officer and the federal prosecutor. Dressed in a military uniform, Choi paced the courtroom, serving as his own lawyer.

“All I want at the end of this day is to return to the U.S. military,” Choi said through tears.

Choi, who is not trained as an attorney, alternated between whispered apologies for his teary breakdowns and loud rebukes of Assistant U.S. Attorney Angela George for failing to refer to him as a lieutenant.

“Please remember where you are,” Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola cautioned after Choi used vulgar slang. “That may be appropriate in the barracks. It’s not appropriate here.”

Choi and the other demonstrators were charged with a criminal misdemeanor. The others had previously pleaded guilty, but had their sentences deferred. Many of them sat among Choi’s friends, family and supporters in the packed courtroom on Thursday.

Choi initially argued that he was prosecuted differently because of the subject of his protest. But Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth ruled that the magistrate judge could not consider the issue of how Choi came to be prosecuted in reaching a verdict.

He could have faced up to six months in jail.

Read what others are saying