The number of children removed from their homes by child abuse investigators in the District has fallen in the past year, but a recent review of some cases concluded that children are still regularly separated from their parents without adequate justification.
The study, conducted by a federally mandated panel of volunteer monitors, examined 27 cases involving 41 children over several years. In many of the instances examined by the panel, children who were placed briefly in foster care should have stayed with their families, the report concluded.
“CFSA’s child removal decisions must balance the need to protect children from serious abuse or neglect with the need to protect children from the significant emotional trauma that comes from the government separating them from their families,” the report, released last week, stated.
The review, released last week, is the latest examination of the challenges that CFSA, like other child welfare agencies, faces in balancing the inclination to remove children when neglect or abuse is suspected and the imperative to leave them in the home unless they are in imminent danger.
In more than half of the reviews conducted, panel members found that the case record did not justify removal.
In one case cited in the report, a social worker removed a child upon discovering suspicious marks on the child’s body, most likely from being whipped with a cord. The social worker placed him and his three siblings, who did not show signs of abuse, into foster care without obtaining a family court order.
After the removal, the social worker met with the mother to work out a strategy, known as a safety plan, for addressing the problems in the home. Less than a week later, the children were back at home. The report said that if this conversation had taken place before the children were taken, foster care would not have been necessary.
CFSA’s statistics show that even as the number of removals are on pace to be their lowest in years, the percentage of children who are being returned home within four months is at 35 percent, roughly the same rate as last year and a higher rate than in any of the previous three years.
Debra Porchia-Usher, the child welfare agency’s interim director, said how quickly children are removed from their families and how quickly they are returned is an issue the CFSA continues to monitor. “We all agree fewer removals are better,” she said. But she does not agree that the problem is as prevalent as the report suggests.
In an effort to make better decisions about removals, the agency recently launched a pilot program of a strategy known as differential response, which acknowledges that not every abuse or neglect report is an indicator of imminent danger.
Earlier this year, the agency also completed a policy manual on conducting investigations. All social workers, supervisors and program managers have been trained using this new resource, Porchia-Usher said.
The process in which children are removed also remains a concern, the review panel’s report said.
Under D.C. law, children are not supposed to be placed in foster care without an order from family court. Removing children on an emergency basis without a judge’s permission can happen only if a child’s physical safety is in immediate danger, and if the only way to avoid serious harm is to remove the child from the home. In more than 75 percent of the cases reviewed by the panel, no such risk was identified, and in none of the cases examined was a court order sought prior to removal.
“In essence, they’re [Child and Family Services] not following the law,”said Judith Sandalow, executive director of the Children’s Law Center, which represents more than 500 children involved in abuse or neglect cases in the District each year.
The removals are traumatizing for children, she said.
“We’ve had kids that thought they were kidnapped,” she said. Whether a child is removed from the family for a few days or a few months, there is potential for kids to regress developmentally. “If a kid is just learning to talk, for example, they might stop talking for a while,” she said.
Susan Gross, the panel chairwoman, said that in many instances, “It felt like they [child protective services social workers] were taking the easy way out so they wouldn’t be caught in a mistake.”
Gross, who has consulted for the Children’s Defense Fund and other organizations, acknowledged, as did the report, that social workers have to make tough decisions every day.
But she said many of the children who were removed in the cases she reviewed could have stayed at home if social workers talked with parents first about obtaining services such as housing and employment assistance. In 16 of the 27 cases the panel studied, such “family team meetings,” as they’re called, were not conducted until the family was already separated. According to CFSA, these meetings were not always feasible prior to removing a child.
Initially, in responding to the panel’s report, Porchia-Usher said the review had relied only on summaries and not on supporting documentation. But after panel members disputed the agency’s assertion, CSFA spokeswoman Mindy Good said Porchia-Usher had been incorrect and that documentation in some cases may have been lacking.