After months of debate, U-Va. board votes to increase tuition

Norm Shafer/For The Washington Post - Tuition, housing, meal plans and some fees will increase this fall at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville.

CHARLOTTESVILLE — The University of Virginia Board of Visitors voted Thursday to increase tuition for in-state undergraduates by 3.8 percent and for out-of-state students by 4.8 percent for the upcoming school year, meaning Virginians will pay about $450 more and out-of-state students will pay roughly $1,825 more at the state’s flagship public school.

The board also approved increasing on-campus housing prices by about 3.5 percent and meal plans by about 2.9 percent. And starting this fall, incoming engineering students will pay an additional $2,000 per year to cover the program’s higher expenses.

U-Va. leaders disagree on need for proposed tuition increases

U-Va. leaders disagree on need for proposed tuition increases

Governing board members question the need for tuition and fee increases outlined in four-year plan.

U-Va. financial plan calls for tuition and fee increases

U-Va.  financial plan calls for tuition and fee increases

U-Va. plan would increase tuition, clashing with the Board of Visitors’ vision.

More news about education

Loudoun considers ending Thomas Jefferson bus service

The county School Board may cut funding to transport students to the magnet high school in Fairfax County.

E-mail from Woodson High School to parents

E-mail from Woodson High School to parents

Following a series of suicides, the Woodson community is working to prevent more loss.

Parents seek action at Woodson High after suicides

Parents seek action at Woodson High after suicides

The Fairfax County school’s parents want to prevent more suicides after six student deaths in three years.

Read more

The vote to increase tuition and costs for U-Va. students came after more than four months of intense debate about the university’s financial future. Some board members argued that any tuition increase was too much during difficult economic times, while U-Va. President Teresa A. Sullivan and her staff advocated for tuition increases to offset declining state funding.

Earlier this year, Sullivan and her staff released a four-year financial plan that called for moderate, predictable tuition increases, plus charging third- and fourth-year students an additional $2,000 per year to cover the costs of their smaller classes, advising, career opportunities, internships and global programs. That extra charge was at first called “tuition,” then referred to as an “Academic Excellence Fee.” The controversial concept was not mentioned in the latest materials given to board members this week.

Although Sullivan and her top two deputies mostly quietly listened at Thursday’s meeting, they have argued previously that two decades of declining state funding have starved the school of much-needed revenue. The university holds top rankings and a storied reputation now, but they say the school’s reputation could slip if officials do not strategically hire the next generation of faculty, fund innovative projects and encourage research.

Board leader Helen E. Dragas, who helped organize a failed ouster of Sullivan last summer, has long advocated for keeping tuition rates low and reining in university spending. Dragas argued Thursday that U-Va. leaders have long used decreased state funding as a “scapegoat” for ever-increasing spending.

Dragas and another board member, Dr. Edward D. Miller, voted against a package of tuition increases, which included charging graduate and professional students more. Later in the meeting, Dragas threatened to not vote to approve a capital improvements plan because it included a maintenance facility with a high estimated price.

“We cannot stay on an unsustainable tuition increase path,” Dragas told the board in explaining her vote. “A lot of institutions across the country, a lot of states, are holding the line on tuition this year.”

Several board members passionately argued that if U-Va. did not increase tuition — or did not increase it enough — the school could find itself in financial danger. That group included John L. Nau III, a beer distributor from Texas who appeared closely allied with Dragas last summer. Nau added up the expenses the university faces in the next school year — such as unfunded or partially funded mandates from the state, inflation and other expenses — and said that the proposed increases didn’t seem adequate, even if the university cuts expenses.

“From a business perspective, you are not giving yourself a lot of room to wiggle,” Nau said, advocating for higher fees. “It seems to me that we are living right on a razor’s edge.”

During the board meeting, a few dozen activists gathered in the historic Rotunda building as part of an ongoing campaign demanding better pay for low-level staff members. They held posters with the slogans “No more excuses” and “Living wage now!”

 
Read what others are saying