As a supporter of the charter school movement, I get grief from people who say that charters — independent public schools using tax dollars — are private schools in disguise. They are almost always wrong about that, but there are enough Pacific Collegiate situations to make me wonder whether the rules need revision.
Places such as California, where the law allows some preferences, are more likely to have this problem than the District. The city’s charter law and demographics would give Pacific Collegiate a much more diverse student body.
That still leaves selective practices such as the seven-page form, including essay questions, that applicants must fill out for the Gateway High School charter in San Francisco or the lottery-exempt status as “founding parents” offered by some Los Angeles charters to applicants who promise money and volunteer time, as revealed by the L.A. Weekly newspaper.
Todd Ziebarth, vice president for state advocacy and support at the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools, said vague state laws let charter authorizers, such as universities or state or local school boards, occasionally wink at loopholes. To stop that, 12 Newark charters have signed a compact barring any burdensome requirements, such as attending information meetings or filling out long forms, before the lottery period.
There is a subtler issue. What if parents and students are discouraged by the higher standards that make the best charters worth attending? The KIPP schools, part of a charter network with longer hours and proven achievement gains, require that students, parents and teachers sign contracts affirming their responsibilities, such as promptness and good behavior. Some readers have told me that they assume that students who violate those rules are expelled. The truth is that such contracts have been used by teachers to set guidelines in regular schools since long before KIPP began. Violators may be mildly disciplined but not expelled.
I know that because I have investigated KIPP for 10 years and written a book about it. Some parents don’t have the time or inclination to ask a lot of questions. I can see why they might get the wrong impression or just think their child is not up to so much work.
Pacific Principal Archie Douglas said his school requires every student to take at least five Advanced Placement courses. I think that’s great, but not all parents agree with me. Douglas says his school’s request for funds and time is necessary because California financial support for charters is so low, about half of what D.C. charters get. Only 30 percent of his families donate as much as $3,000. His school’s distance from large low-income neighborhoods frustrates recruiting, but last year the school reserved six of a possible 56 slots for a lottery just for students whose parents had less than two years of college.
Gateway Executive Director Sharon Olken defends her application essay questions as a way to help parents and students think through what kind of school they want. Their answers are not read until after they are admitted. Nearly half of Gateway students are from low-income homes, close to the city average, despite the long form.
I still don’t think they need the essay questions. Charters spend public money. They should do everything possible to convince parents that their doors are open to all, as long as that doesn’t get in the way of the deep and imaginative teaching that they are there to provide.