George Allen’s Senate record a mixed bag

George Allen never appeared destined for a long Senate career.

The former Virginia governor expressed impatience with the chamber from the moment he arrived in 2001. It “moves at the pace of a wounded sea slug,” he once complained — and soon he began eyeing a larger prize: the White House.

More news about Va. politics

Wilder says tweet about GOP ticket wasn’t necessarily an endorsement

Fredrick Kunkle

Tweet sent in former Democratic Va. governor’s name seemed to back Cuccinelli, running mates.

Star Scientific vs. state of Virginia lawsuit headed for December trial

Rosalind S. Helderman

Suit pits controversial dietary supplement maker against the state of Virginia in a tax dispute.

In a switch, McAuliffe now supports drilling for oil off of Va. coast

Ben Pershing

Democrat now thinks it can be done in “a responsible fashion.”

Read more

Yet after seeing his career derailed by a stunning reelection loss in 2006, Allen is determined to regain that seat, running hard against Timothy M. Kaine (D) in perhaps the closest and most closely watched Senate contest in the country. Allen’s previous Senate term has become a flash point in the race and offers a host of clues about what he would do if he succeeds.

Lawmakers and aides who worked with Allen said that while he was able to advance a handful of key legislative issues, he was not in the chamber long enough to build a lengthy list of achievements. He occasionally worked across the aisle but typically voted the Republican leadership’s line and steered his party’s aggressive effort to gain seats in 2004.

Sen. Lamar Alexander, who served with Allen on the Energy and Natural Resources Committee, said Allen was “ahead of the curve” on energy and high-tech policy.

“He brought the perspective of a governor to all these issues, meaning that while he argued for his principles, he also worked to get a result,” said Alexander (R-Tenn.).

Democrats saw Allen differently — as a partisan with a thin legislative record.

“He did a good job of picking and choosing spots to work on that were important to his constituencies, including the high-tech issues,” recalled Jim Manley, a former top aide to Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) and Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.). “But for any Democrat looking to work with a Republican, he’d be one of the last people that anyone would think of.”

A narrow focus

New senators are typically advised to pick one or two issues and focus on them. In Allen’s case, that meant he spent the bulk of his time working on high-tech policy — a top priority for a booming industry in Northern Virginia.

“He dug deep into his committee assignments, actually worked hard on those and cultured some expertise,” recalled Eric Ueland, who was a top aide to former majority leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.).

Critics, including some Republicans, disagree, contending that Allen compiled an undistinguished legislative record, even for a one-term senator.

Allen touts accomplishments on several fronts, from technology and energy policy to helping veterans and reforming the budget process.

In 2001, he sponsored an amendment that gave tax breaks to families buying computers. He worked to extend the moratorium on Internet taxes, restrict spam and fund nano­technology research. Allen also pushed a bill to boost technology funding for historically black colleges and universities.

For veterans, Allen worked to raise the death benefit for the families of fallen troops to $100,000, and like most lawmakers, he voted for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan without providing ways to pay for them.

Allen consistently received high marks from right-leaning groups such as the American Conservative Union and the National Right to Life Committee, and he voted in support of President George W. Bush’s positions more than 95 percent of the time, according to statistics from Congressional Quarterly.