After health-care ruling come doubts that some states can meet key deadlines

With Thursday’s Supreme Court ruling upholding President Obama’s landmark health-care law, debate has shifted to whether deadlines key to the law’s goal of expanding coverage to tens of millions of Americans will be pushed back.

Some say states and the federal government are facing such complex technical and political realities that some deadlines need to be relaxed, including the Jan. 1, 2014, opening of online marketplaces where individuals and small businesses will be able to shop for coverage. And there may be pressure in Congress to delay some spending on the law to help reduce the federal budget deficit.

Graphic

How will the health-care ruling affect me?
Click Here to View Full Graphic Story

How will the health-care ruling affect me?

More from PostPolitics

Second-guessing John Roberts

Second-guessing John Roberts

As the head of the Supreme Court heads overseas, experts wondering whether he switched his vote.

States consider health-care options

States consider health-care options

How the health-care law affirmed by the Supreme Court will affect you depends on where you live.

Health care and the Supreme Court

Health care and the Supreme Court

THE BIG STORY | Keep track of full coverage of the health-care decision and the political fallout.

Except in a few states, it’s impossible to do this in the time allowed — it’s going to have to slip,” said Joseph Antos of the conservative American Enterprise Institute.

For its part, the federal government says the marketplaces and other elements of the law will move forward on time.

“I believe we’re on schedule to implement the Affordable Care Act in the manner in which the statute contemplates,” Mike Hash, interim director of the federal Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight, told reporters Friday.

More than $850 million in grants has gone to states to plan their exchanges, with most accepting the money, even states where lawmakers have opposed moving forward with any aspect of the health-care law. Still, only 14 states and the District of Columbia have passed legislation authorizing the exchanges. And legislation is just one piece. States also must upgrade computer systems, create governing organizations and define what “essential benefits” insurers must include in policies sold on their exchanges.

“Somewhere between 20 and 40 states may not be ready,” said consultant Robert Laszewski, a former insurance industry executive.

Still, delaying a key part of the law — the insurance exchanges where Americans will shop for coverage, qualify for subsidies or enroll in Medicaid — would have big political and practical consequences. States such as California, Maryland and Connecticut are already well underway in their efforts to have exchanges open for enrollment in the fall of next year.

“States that are ready are going to want to go forward in 2014 because people will expect the tax credits” and the new rules that prevent insurers from rejecting people with medical conditions, said Joel Ario, former director of the Office of Health Insurance Exchanges in the Obama administration and a managing director at Manatt Health Solutions.

Still, there are many states that are unenthusiastic about the law and have made little progress in implementing exchanges. Some are awaiting the outcome of the November election before taking any action.

The federal government is working to build fallback exchanges that will be available for states that cannot or will not run their own. The effort includes creation of a federal data hub that will provide state exchanges with data from the Internal Revenue Service and other federal agencies. Some have questioned whether it will be ready.

Loading...

Comments

Add your comment
 
Read what others are saying About Badges

    Pastor’s tornado tweets stir up a theological debate