Redskins’ DeAngelo Hall was among the best corners of 2013

July 29, 2014

(Photo by Toni L. Sandys/The Washington Post)

If you ask me who the best fancy stats blogger is, I am going to say myself, so it is no surprise that Richard Sherman says he is the best corner in the NFL.

But ask DeAngelo Hall, and he will say DeAngelo Hall.

And if you are New York Jets corner Dee Milliner, well, you see where this is going.

“The best corner in the league? Me,” Milliner said in an interview Saturday. “I ain’t gonna say that somebody else is better than me.”

There is only room for one corner at the top (and, spoiler alert, it isn’t Milliner), so who is it?

If we are going by a quarterback’s sheer fear to throw at a receiver being covered, then Sherman, a member of Seattle’s Legion of Boom, wins hands down. According to Pro Football Focus, opposing quarterbacks only threw in Sherman’s direction 57 times last season and had just a 36.2 rating during that time – best among the 32 corners who took 75 percent of their team’s snaps last season.

But a cornerback’s job involves more than limiting targets,  intercepting the ball and forcing fumbles, so to quantify all the little things we need to look at player evaluation a bit differently. And that includes considering more advanced metrics such as Win Probability Added and Expected Points Added.

WPA starts with a Win Probability (WP) model of the game of football. Every situation in a game gives each opponent a particular chance of winning, and a WP model estimates those chances. The model created here at Advanced NFL Stats uses score, time, down, distance, and field position to estimate how likely each team will go on to win the game. For example, at the start of the 2nd quarter, a team down by 7 points with a 2nd down and 5 from their own 25 will win about 36% of the time–in other words a 0.36 WP.

We can measure the values of situations and, by extension, the outcomes of plays by establishing an equivalence in terms of points. To do this we can start by looking back through recent NFL history at the ‘next points scored’ for all plays. For example, if we look at all 1st and 10s from an offense’ own 20-yard line, the team on offense will score next slightly more often than its opponent. If we add up all the ‘next points’ scored for and against the offense’s team, whether on the current drive or subsequent drives, we can estimate the net point advantage an offense can expect for any football situation. For a 1st and 10 at an offense’s own 20, it’s +0.4 net points, and at the opponent’s 20, it’s +4.0 net points. These net point values are called Expected Points (EP), and every down-distance-field position situation has a corresponding EP value.

These metrics offer a new framework for evaluating defensive play.

All we need to do is add up all the WPA (or EPA) for each play in which the WPA (or EPA) was positive. “+WPA” and “+EPA” add up the value of every sack, interception, pass defense, forced fumble or recovery, and every tackle or assist that results in a setback for the offense.

What these stats measure is “playmaking” ability. When I watch the NFL Films shows, the sideline audio is usually filled with coaches urging on their players with an emphatic, “Go out there and make a play!” Simply stated, +WPA (and +EPA) puts a number on playmaking.

Here is how the cornerbacks who played 16 games last season rank in terms of +WPA and +EPA. Those in the upper right, the elite corners of 2013, had better seasons than those in the lower left.

Source: (Advanced Football Analytics)

The first player that jumps out is Hall, who despite all his foibles was third in +WPA and first in +EPA among all corners who suited up for at least one game last season, making him one of the premier playmakers in the league. Sherman was 20th and ninth, respectively.

Now I know what you are thinking: The same DeAngelo Hall who is considered “an accident in the Redskins’ secondary waiting to happen?” The same DeAngelo Hall who is “vastly overrated and overpaid?” The same DeAngelo Hall who “can’t cover anybody, can’t break up a pass, averages three or four interceptions a year and can’t be counted on to conduct himself with class and professionalism?”

Yes, and here is why: performance we can’t see and measure correlates tightly with the performance we can see and measure. We tend to remember the extreme highs and lows of a recent game, but forget the little plays from five weeks ago and beyond that helped keep the opposition from getting a first down or driving down the field. Is this a perfect player evaluation tool? No, but it provides more insight than simply looking at who has the most interceptions or who is thrown to the least.

And Ryan Clark, the veteran safety who played with some of the best cornerbacks and safeties in the league, may have had a point when he said the Redskins have “the most talented secondary I’ve been around.” After adding up the +WPA and +EPA of each team’s secondary, Washington occupies the upper right quadrant of the chart.

Source: (Advanced Football Analytics)

Seattle’s Legion of Boom, on the other hand, may be more sizzle than steak. Not to say they aren’t effective, but the chart above shows that there are other secondaries that could contribute more to winning. And DHall is the best player on one of them.

Neil Greenberg analyzes advanced sports statistics for the Fancy Stats blog and prefers to be called a geek rather than a nerd.
Continue reading
Comments
Show Comments
Comments

sports

fancy-stats

Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Stats, scores and schedules
Next Story
· July 29, 2014