The Washington Post

What if Chris Christie had a Snapchat for Gmail?

The logo of mobile app (Lionel Bonaventure/AFP/Getty Images

If there’s one innovation that has the potential to shake up politics in 2014, it’s the arrival of new “erasable Internet” technologies such as Snapchat. Yes, the same technology that teenagers and college students use to exchange selfies might one day be used by politicians and campaign managers to send e-mails to each other that disappear after reading.

There’s obviously a market for such a technology. Case in point: New Jersey Governor Chris Christie’s embarrassing bridge scandal, in which campaign aides were found to be plotting political retaliation against a rival via Gmail. Reading through the series of Gmails between Bridget Anne Kelley and David Wildstein, it’s easy to imagine an alternate scenario of the two of them giggling and swapping photos of the bridge mayhem on the George Washington Bridge via Snapchat. Self-destructing photos would have at least avoided the embarrassing e-mail paper trail (e.g. “Time for some traffic problems in Fort Lee… Got it”), complicating any efforts to find out who was responsible for the scandal.

The idea of a Snapchat for Gmail might not be as far-fetched as it seems. Earlier this month, Jena McGregor of the Washington Post looked at Confide, a new company which promises to bring “off-the-record mobile messaging” into the world of white-collar office workers. A smartphone app such as Confide (already available for iPhone) could eventually replace the office water cooler, enabling co-workers to trade snarky asides about the boss. Hiring managers could trade candid comments about job candidates. With access to “confidential messages that self-destruct,” executives could feel comfortable discussing issues related to double-top-secret corporate strategy. (And politicians would have a way to plan, ahem, extracurricular campaign activities.)

Or what about SecretInk, a “self-destructing messaging service,” which launched in November 2013? It’s easy to imagine the company attracting the attention of venture capitalists eager to recreate the multi-billion-dollar valuation of a Snapchat by extending the same technology into the enterprise market. After signing up for SecretLink, users can choose to send an email or SMS that “self-destructs” after reading, all without the need to actually join any kind of social network. 

Of course, the ability to send messages that self-destruct raises a host of moral, ethical and legal issues. It would seem to hint at a world in which Chris Christie-style bridge scandals are more, not less, likely. It would seem to open the door to hiring decisions based on factors that are unethical, and quite frankly, illegal. It would encourage office environments of cliques, each trading poisonous barbs about one other. And it would empower politicians to think that they were somehow above the law.

On top of that, there’s no guarantee that such a service would actually be secure. Consider that Snapchat has been reeling from revelations that hackers were able to access user identities and phone numbers. Even before these hacker allegations, there were cases of users taking screenshots from Snapchat and passing them around. That would be the ultimate in political payback — taking a screenshot of a text message — and then handing it over to political rivals.

Yet, there’s no doubt that we’re witnessing a sea change in how we use and think about the Web. We’re aware, more than ever, of the potential privacy implications of signing up for social networks. Internet users are aware that anything they do or say online might surface again in the future. No wonder the race is on to create new Internet tools that protect personal privacy. Especially after the NSA scandal, we no longer assume that nobody’s watching.

In hindsight, it appears that many of Chris Christie’s problems could have been prevented if his staffers had access to erasable Internet technologies. Just glancing through the long trail of e-mails between Christie’s two campaign aides, it appears that the most dangerous comments (“Should I be smiling?”) were just a few words each, and thrown around like careless late-night text messages between  teenagers. Won’t other politicians take note of this latest scandal, and begin to search out loopholes to the current system, in which Internet companies such as Google, Facebook and Twitter seem intent on recording your every move?

Maybe the idea of a Snapchat for politicians isn’t so crazy after all, if the choice is between a political campaign that self-destructs or a bunch of personal text messages that self-destruct upon reading.

Dominic Basulto is a futurist and blogger based in New York City.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments

Sign up for email updates from the "Confronting the Caliphate" series.

You have signed up for the "Confronting the Caliphate" series.

Thank you for signing up
You'll receive e-mail when new stories are published in this series.
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
Is fencing the answer to brain health?
Miss Manners: The technology's changed, but the rules are the same
Behind a famous and fast steam locomotive
Play Videos
This man's job is binge-watching for Netflix
How to survive a shark attack
What you need to know about trans fats
Play Videos
Michael Bolton's cinematic serenade to Detroit
How to avoid harmful chemicals in school supplies
Riding the X2 with D.C.'s most famous rapper
Play Videos
Full disclosure: 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, 1 ghoul
How to get organized for back to school
Pandas, from birth to milk to mom
Next Story
Max Ehrenfreund · January 14, 2014

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.