Kicking quantitative easing metaphors

Last week’s “Goldilocks job report” and its mostly-unchanged 6.7 unemployment rate means that the Federal Reserve is unlikely to end quantitative easing, its bond buyback program, anytime soon.

Also unlikely to end soon: journalists’ and talking heads’ repeated comparisons of QE to drug addiction.

Financial Post: “Monetary morphine.” Barry Sternlicht, chief executive of the Starwood Capital Group: “Heroin addiction.” The Guardian: “Drug habit.” USA Today: “Fed steroids.” The Street: “The drug the market craves.” Peter Schiff, chief executive of Euro Pacific Capital: “Keeping a drug addict high.” BBC: “Miracle cure or dangerous addiction?” Forbes: “The Federal Reserve is now badly hooked.”

Yes: Quantitative easing is a controversial, unproven program with unclear costs and benefits initiated during the Great Recession’s darkest days.

But is it any more addictive than a tired metaphor?

Justin Wm. Moyer is a reporter for The Washington Post's Morning Mix. Follow him on Twitter: @justinwmmoyer.

national

morning-mix

Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Comments
Show Comments

Sign up for email updates from the "Confronting the Caliphate" series.

You have signed up for the "Confronting the Caliphate" series.

Thank you for signing up
You'll receive e-mail when new stories are published in this series.
Most Read National

national

morning-mix

Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Next Story
Lindsey Bever · April 7, 2014

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.