The Washington Post

The Boy Scouts’ leadership loss

Tom Pennington/Getty Images

On Thursday, the 1,400 voting members of the National Council of the Boy Scouts of America voted to approve a resolution that would remove the restriction denying membership to youth based on their sexual orientation. "While people have different opinions about this policy, we can all agree that kids are better off when they are in Scouting," the organization said in a statement. "Going forward, our Scouting family will continue to focus on reaching and serving youth in order to help them grow into good, strong citizens."

The vote does not change the Boy Scouts' existing ban on gay adult leaders, however. "A change to the current membership policy for adult leaders was not under consideration," the statement reads, "thus, the policy for adults remains in place."

While the move to allow gay Scouts is sure to cheer some as a measure of progress—and it's commendable the organization finally agreed to open itself up to all youth—the decision not to do the same for Scout leaders employs confounding logic and sends a mixed message to both the gay community and the millions of children involved in the Boy Scouts.

As I wrote in April when the resolution was first announced, the proposal's differing treatment of its members and adult leaders raises troubling questions for young scouts who are gay. Why will you accept me now but not when I'm older? Does this mean my opportunities for the future are unequal to my peers’? And how can an organization designed to build character and empower children simultaneously discriminate against potential leaders, if not its members? As James Dale, the scoutmaster who was expelled for being gay, wrote in the Post earlier this week, "equality cannot be doled out in fits and starts."

Moreover, it’s often said that an organization is only as good as its leaders. If the Boy Scouts does not allow gay and lesbian adults to become troop leaders, it is limiting the pool of people who can contribute their talents and energies to the Scouts' mission. The vote today to allow gay youth to become Boy Scouts may be a step forward. But until they welcome gay leaders, too, the Boy Scouts is missing a chance to follow its oath and be its best.

Jena McGregor is a columnist for On Leadership.

Read also:

No merit badges for the Boy Scouts’ proposal on gays

Washington area Boy Scout leaders should state their position on admitting gays

Like On Leadership? Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Jena McGregor writes a daily column analyzing leadership in the news for the Washington Post’s On Leadership section.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
Making family dinnertime happen
Deaf banjo player teaches thousands
New limbs for Pakistani soldiers
Play Videos
A veteran finds healing on a dog sled
Learn to make this twice-baked cookie
How to prevent 'e-barrassment'
Play Videos
Syrian refugee: 'I’m committed to the power of music'
The art of tortilla-making
Michael Bolton's cinematic serenade to Detroit
Play Videos
Circus nuns: These sisters are no act
5 ways to raise girls to be leaders
Cool off with sno-balls, a New Orleans treat
Next Story
Tom Fox · May 23, 2013

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.