The Washington Post

A funny thing happened on the way from the forum


It has been one year since riots erupted in Istanbul’s Taksim Square and 25 years since the granddaddy of them all, Beijing’s Tiananmen Square, was burned into our consciousness with the image of a young man staring down a column of tanks. Particularly since the recent spate of upheavals following the 2011 Arab Spring uprisings, it would seem that these leaderless revolutions in public squares across the globe have displaced the Gandhis, Mandelas and Martin Luther Kings of movements past.

But that, it turns out, is their fatal flaw.

The rapid pace of urbanization is turning cities into petri dishes for such phenomena. India, for example, will add another 500 million to its cities by 2050, and Nigeria will add almost 200 million. This urban boom is putting pressure on housing, infrastructure, public health and even clean air and water. And when governments fail to meet these citizens’ needs, mobile technologies and close living quarters make it easier than ever to take to the square en masse in protest.

Yet the reality is that even this new breed of political revolution requires a Nelson Mandela—something we’ve forgotten in our eagerness to celebrate the power of a decentralized, digital generation. We may not need a single leader today to start a movement for change, but it turns out we still need one to make those changes stick. That’s why so many of the recent revolutions have essentially devolved into chaos.

We have seen squares light up across a wide arc that runs from Caracas to Kiev in protest against the status quo. From the perspective of those who celebrate the power of bottom-up democracy, such movements are inspiring. And for those who celebrate the power of modern technology, such political disruption is an exciting sign of virtual tools effecting real-world change.

However, a funny thing happened on the way from the forum. These forces of disequilibrium shook the status quo, but never transitioned to a new and better state. For this, we still need a leader and institution-builder in the flesh and blood.

Digital advances have dispensed with the need for someone at the head leading the charge with old-fashioned personal charisma, soaring oratory and strategic vision. But what this means is that budding leaders within these revolutions do not get to practice their leadership skills in front of smaller audiences, steadily growing the size of their followership and their leadership ambitions.

Remember that every one of history’s iconic leaders started off somewhere small: Mahatma Gandhi with his act of civil disobedience on a train in South Africa, Mandela with the ANC Youth League and Martin Luther King, Jr. with the Montgomery bus boycott.  They each experimented with their tactics, made mistakes, sharpened their skills in smaller arenas and developed, as a result, into stronger leaders.

In the leaderless, digitally mediated revolutions we are seeing today, that path to leadership no longer applies. The crowd converges and topples statues, the images ricochet around the world, then more people converge on the square until eventually the ill they are fighting against is ousted. But what follows? A vacuum.

It is interesting to contrast two political transitions that concluded last month—in Egypt, a poster child for this new type of revolution, and in India, where the electoral process alone took a staggering six weeks. India’s size and diversity make it virtually impossible for a handful of squares to bring about nationwide change, so it has to rely on the largest and most laborious democratic elections in the world. The newly elected prime minister, Narendra Modi, had a chance to practice his leadership skills and, more significantly, make some serious mistakes at the local level before stepping onto a national platform. Regardless of whether a voter was a Modi fan or not, the mood is one of hope and high expectation in India.

In Egypt on the other hand, the last elected leader, Mohamed Morsi, arrived at the end of a glorious revolution with few market-tested leadership skills and was summarily removed. Now, the country has resigned itself to voting back into power the status quo. Abdel Fattah el-Sisi’s primary qualification is that he represents what passes for equilibrium: stability through military might.  He is man without a plan for how to bring about real change that the supposedly game-changing march onto Tahrir Square intended to usher in.

The ease of digital revolutions has done away with the training grounds that all leaders need before they go up for prime time. And that may prove the ultimate Achilles heel of this new form of political protest. Without a singular battle-tested leader, you end up with the conundrum that the people of Cairo face—a strongman in power, because there is no alternative. Or that the people of Bangkok face—a strongman as a stopgap.

It takes blood, sweat and tears and many smaller uprisings to produce great leaders who lead big revolutions and then build new institutions that last. In the absence of a process for incubating such leadership, we run the risk of coming full circle: exactly where we started before we got mad, pulled out our mobile phones and marched upon the square.

Bhaskar Chakravorti is the senior associate dean of international business and finance at the Fletcher School at Tufts University. He is also the founding executive director of Fletcher’s Institute for Business in the Global Context and the author of “The Slow Pace of Fast Change.”

Read also:

Taking American leadership back from political elites

Dreaming in India

Like On Leadership? Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Chakravorti is senior associate dean of International Business & Finance at Tufts University’s the Fletcher School. He’s also the founding director of the Institute for Business in the Global Context and author of The Slow Pace of Fast Change. Formerly a partner at McKinsey, he taught innovation at Harvard Business School.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
How to make Sean Brock's 'Heritage' cornbread
New limbs for Pakistani soldiers
The signature dish of Charleston, S.C.
Play Videos
Why seasonal allergies make you miserable
John Lewis, 'Marv the Barb' and the politics of barber shops
What you need to know about filming the police
Play Videos
The Post taste tests Pizza Hut's new hot dog pizza
5 tips for using your thermostat
Michael Bolton's cinematic serenade to Detroit
Play Videos
Full disclosure: 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, 1 ghoul
Pandas, from birth to milk to mom
The signature drink of New Orleans
Next Story
Jena McGregor · June 24, 2014

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.