Arizona’s ‘super extreme DUI’ and how we measure impaired driving in the U.S.


(Kirsty Wigglesworth/AP)

Here is a little news out of Arizona involving driving under the influence. From the Arizona Republic:

Phoenix Suns player P.J. Tucker was arrested for “super extreme DUI” in May by Scottsdale police.

A “super extreme DUI,” you say? What makes this particular DUI so super or extreme? More from the Arizona Republic:

Tucker’s blood alcohol content registered at .201 on a preliminary breath test in the field on May 10, according to Scottsdale police. A driver is considered legally drunk for a DUI charge in Arizona at .08 blood-alcohol content.

A blood test administered after Tucker was taken to jail and later analyzed by Arizona DPS showed his blood alcohol-content to be .222, according to the police report.

Okay, so that is particularly extreme. (Tucker, meanwhile, who spent the last two seasons with the Phoenix Suns, was re-signed to a multi-season contract last week.) But why does Arizona have such a designation? And what actually happens to drivers when they have a certain blood-alcohol level? Let’s break down drinking, driving and how such things are measured and punished.

First, the rules: In the United States, anything north of 0.08 percent is against the law. This has become the generally agreed-upon measurement, even if it isn’t entirely agreed-upon. (More on that in a moment.)

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says that when a driver is at 0.02 percent, they are less able to keep an eye on moving objects and multitask; once the driver hits 0.05 percent, they have trouble steering and coordinating. At 0.08 percent, though, drivers have problems with perception, concentration and speed control. Even higher percentages make it harder for drivers to stay in one lane (0.1 percent) and maintain control of the vehicle (0.15 percent), according to the CDC.

Nearly one-third of all traffic deaths in 2012 involved drivers with a blood-alcohol reading of at least 0.08 percent, reports the Department of Transportation’s National Highway Safety Administration. More than half of the drivers involved in these fatal crashes measured at 0.15 percent or greater.  (More than 10,300 people were killed that year in these crashes. Just under two-thirds of the people killed were driving.)

The law of the land is that driving with a blood-alcohol level of at least 0.08 percent is a crime, though exactly how the crime is punished varies from state to state. (The Governors Highway Safety Association has a handy list here, outlining how the punishments vary in terms of length and what happens to the drivers.)

Arizona added the “super extreme DUI” charge in 2007 to cover anyone with a blood-alcohol level of at least .20 percent, which can carry with it a sentence of 45 days in prison. The “extreme DUI” category in Arizona, covering measurements of at least 0.15 but less than 0.20 percent, has a punishment of 30 days in prison.

At what level is a person’s driving actually impaired? This has been the subject of some debate. The National Transportation Safety Board recommended last year that the U.S. set 0.05 percent as the limit for legal driving, citing research showing that the risk goes up once a driver reaches the 0.05 percent mark. Lowering the legal limit “would lead to meaningful reductions in crashes, injuries, and fatalities,” the leading federal safety advocate said in a report.

This isn’t a new theory, either. An article in the Journal of the American Medical Association published in 1986 spoke of the “scientific consensus that alcohol causes deterioration of driving skills beginning at 0.05″ percent. The AMA recommended that all states adopt the 0.05 percent measurement for impaired driving.

But when the NTSB made its recommendation last year, there was some push-back. “This recommendation is ludicrous,” Sarah Longwell, managing director of the American Beverage Institute, a restaurant trade group, said in a statement at the time. “Moving from 0.08 to 0.05 would criminalize perfectly responsible behavior.” Meanwhile, Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx didn’t express much enthusiasm for making a national push. More than a year later, the national standard remains 0.08 percent.

Mark Berman is a reporter on the National staff. He runs Post Nation, a destination for breaking news and developing stories from around the country.
Comments
Show Comments
Most Read National
Next Story
Natalie Jennings · July 29