The Washington Post

Hillary Clinton’s Capitol Hill tour de force

Just in case the world had forgotten about the substantial political abilities of Hillary Clinton, she reminded everyone of them during hearings focused on the Benghazi, Libya attacks Wednesday on Capitol Hill.

Hillary Clinton and John McCain. Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg

Clinton spent the better part of six hours -- first before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee then before the House Foreign Affairs Committee -- answering often withering questions and critiques about the attacks that left four American diplomats including Ambassador Chris Stevens dead.

She did so without once making news -- in a bad way --  on an incredibly sensitive and divisive issue while displaying (in relatively equal measure) sadness, anger, humor and seriousness, not to mention an unquestioned depth of knowledge on the subject matter. And she did so having spent much of the last month out of the public eye as she sought to recover from a concussion and blood clot.

From a pure political performance perspective, it was a masterwork.  (We'll leave the question of whether what Clinton said was sound from a diplomatic and policy perspective to others who know much more on those subjects than us.)

Because it feels like Hillary Clinton has always been a part of our public life, it's easy to overlook just how difficult what she did on Wednesday actually is.  But, try this exercise: Imagine anyone else weighing a bid for president in Clinton's shoes on Wednesday.  Could Govs. Martin O'Malley (Md.) or Andrew Cuomo (N.Y.) have pulled it off as smoothly as Clinton? No.  Neither could Sens. Amy Klobuchar (Minn.) or Kirstin Gillibrand (N.Y.).

(The only potential 2016 Democratic candidate who could have come close to Clinton's performance is Vice President Joe Biden but, given Biden's tendency to talk too much, he might have gotten himself into trouble.)

That's not a judgment on the relative abilities of Cuomo, O'Malley, Klobuchar or Gillibrand. Rather, it simply proves that Clinton is, at the moment, in a different political class than the other possible Democratic candidates in 2016.

Think of it this way. Everyone mentioned above except Clinton is like Anthony Davis, the star center of the New Orleans Hornets (soon to be Pelicans!).  Davis was the number one pick in the 2012 NBA Draft and has a skill set -- long arms, great instincts, good leaping ability -- that should add up to stardom. But, he has struggled somewhat in his rookie year as he tries to adjust to the NBA game and find out what he needs to do to be successful. Cuomo, O'Malley and the rest all are seen as rising political stars but they haven't proven it on the national stage just yet. And, when/if they do decide to run, there will be an adjustment period of some indeterminate length as they figure out what works for them and what, well, doesn't.

Clinton, on the other hand, is like Kobe Bryant.  Bryant is not only a unique talent but he's been around long enough to understand the rhythm of an NBA season, to pick his spots, to figure out different ways to score now that he is older and his athleticism is fading. That's Clinton.  She understands her own political strengths and weaknesses. She gets the game of politics and she knows how to play it. She is a finished product, politically speaking.

Now, that doesn't mean that if Clinton decides to run for president in 2016 -- and everything we hear is that she simply isn't thinking about it right now and won't be making a decision anytime soon -- that she would be a shoo-in to be the Democratic nominee.

Clinton had many of these same political strengths when she ran for president in 2008, and we know how that turned out.  In that race, she ran into someone in Barack Obama who simply had more natural ability as a politician than she did, and that talent wiped out all of the seeming advantages she had accrued over her years in public service.

But, at least at the moment, there doesn't appear to be a Barack Obama-like figure in the 2016 Democratic field.  And, Clinton almost certainly has learned some lessons from the overly cautious, top-down approach she brought to the 2008 race.

Add it all up and here's what Hillary Clinton reminded the political world of on Wednesday: If she runs in 2016, she is the top tier of the Democratic field.

Chris Cillizza writes “The Fix,” a politics blog for the Washington Post. He also covers the White House.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
What can babies teach students?
Unconventional warfare with a side of ale
A veteran finds healing on a dog sled
Play Videos
A fighter pilot helmet with 360 degrees of sky
Is fencing the answer to brain health?
Scenes from Brazil's Carajás Railway
Play Videos
How a hacker group came to Washington
The woman behind the Nats’ presidents ‘Star Wars’ makeover
How hackers can control your car from miles away
Play Videos
Philadelphia's real signature sandwich
Full disclosure: 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, 1 ghoul
Europe's migrant crisis, explained
Next Story
Rachel Weiner · January 24, 2013

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.