The Washington Post

It’s not the pill, it’s the payment: What polling says about the contraception mandate

On Friday the Obama administration filed its argument with the Supreme Court for why some Catholic groups should not be allowed to deny their employees contraception coverage, the latest salvo in an ongoing battle over how to treat those with religious beliefs under its new health law. While it remains unclear how the nation's highest court will resolve the issue, one thing is clear: while Americans back the idea of contraception coverage in general, they are divided over whether to compel businesses and nonprofits with religious objections to provide it.

Protesters rallied against the health-care law’s contraception mandate in Philadelphia last year. (Alex Brandon/AP)

The Affordable Care Act's mandate that employers cover contraception and related medications and procedures, such as the birth control pill, the morning-after pill and permanent measures such as tubal ligation, without a co-pay, has emerged as one of the law's most contentious provisions. It has prompted dozens of lawsuits from organizations that argue it violates their constitutional right to religious freedom. The Supreme Court will hear arguments on the issue this year.

On Tuesday Justice Sonia Sotomayor issued a stay at the request of an order of nuns from Colorado who said the rule violated their religious freedom, giving them a temporary reprieve from the requirement. The Catholic Church opposes artificial birth control.

The owners of some corporations have separately made the case that providing insurance that covers some contraceptives — or any contraceptives, according to some of the complaints — violates their religious freedom. The Supreme Court will decide that question later this year.

While the battle is playing out in the courts, the public remains torn over how to resolve it. Surveys show wide support for requiring birth control coverage in health insurance -- especially for publicly held corporations -- but significantly less support when religious objections are involved.

March 2012 Post-ABC national poll, for example, found 61 percent saying birth control should be covered by health insurance, with 50 percent backing this "strongly." But when these same people were asked whether the government should require such coverage when it is provided through religiously-affiliated employers who oppose birth control, support for the mandate dropped to 49 percent. About one in 10 respondents (11 percent to be exact) changed their mind when religious objections were brought to light, boosting opposition from 35 to 46 percent.

Other surveys find Americans making a similar case-by-case judgment. A CBS News/New York Times poll in December 2013 found 55 percent saying employers should be able to opt out of covering the full cost of birth control for female employees if they have religious or moral objections, compared to 37 percent who favored a requirement. By contrast, 66 percent supported the mandate when CBS/NYT first asked about the mandate without explicit mention of religious or moral objections of employers in February 2012. A Fall 2012 Public Religion Research Institute survey also found a range of support for a mandate -- 62 percent for publicly held corporations vs. 42 percent for churches who held religious objections.

The malleability of public opinion indicates Americans may be weighing competing values, including broad acceptance of birth control as a part of health coverage and a sensitivity to sincere religious objections.

Regardless of public attitudes, the administration is not backing down when it comes to its contraception coverage requirement. Nonprofits such as the nuns from Denver may opt out of the requirement simply by certifying that they have religious objections, Soliciator General Donald B. Verrilli Jr. wrote in a response to Sotomayor filed Friday morning.

“The employer-applicants here are eligible for religious accommodations set out in the regulations that exempt them from any requirement ‘to contract, arrange, pay, or refer for contraceptive coverage,’” Verrilli wrote. “They need only self-certify that they are non-profit organizations that hold themselves out as religious and have religious objections to providing coverage for contraceptive services.”



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
How to make Sean Brock's 'Heritage' cornbread
New limbs for Pakistani soldiers
The signature dish of Charleston, S.C.
Play Videos
Why seasonal allergies make you miserable
John Lewis, 'Marv the Barb' and the politics of barber shops
What you need to know about filming the police
Play Videos
The Post taste tests Pizza Hut's new hot dog pizza
5 tips for using your thermostat
Michael Bolton's cinematic serenade to Detroit
Play Videos
Full disclosure: 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, 1 ghoul
Pandas, from birth to milk to mom
The signature drink of New Orleans
Next Story
Sean Sullivan · January 3, 2014

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.