Last year, I blogged about a California trial court opinion holding that a driver who looked at his cell phone’s map application while on the road violated a California law against driving while “using a wireless telephone.” I didn’t find the decision persuasive. Fortunately, reason has prevailed: In a decision handed down Thursday, the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court in People v. Spriggs. From the introduction:
Spriggs contends he did not violate the statute because he was not talking on the telephone. We agree. Based on the statute’s language, its legislative history, and subsequent legislative enactments, we conclude that the statute means what it says – it prohibits a driver only from holding a wireless telephone while conversing on it. Consequently, we reverse his conviction.
The correct result, in my view.