The case against the Kelo decision – Part I

Two flaws in the Kelo decision that are troubling from a wide range of perspectives on constitutional law. This is the third in a series of posts based on my new book "The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. City of New London and the Limits of Eminent Domain."

Defending judicial supremacy

Legal scholar Michael Ramsey offers a thoughtful defense of judicial supremacy in constitutional interpretation - the idea that officials in the other branches of government must obey judicial decisions declaring their laws or policies unconstitutional, and follow them in similar future cases unless and until the rulings are reversed.