The Washington Post

Arkansas vs. Roe v. Wade

Today, the Arkansas legislature did something unprecedented: It overrode a governor's veto to ban all abortions after 12 weeks' gestation.

The ACLU of Arkansas has promised to challenge the restriction in court, setting up a potentially interesting battle over what right to abortion Roe v. Wade actually protects.

In that landmark decision, the Supreme Court recognized viability — the point when a fetus could live outside the womb — as when states retain the right to ban elective abortions.

"If the State is interested in protecting fetal life after viability," the court wrote in Roe, "it may go so far as to proscribe abortion during that period, except when it is necessary to preserve the life or health of the mother."

The Supreme Court reaffirmed this standard in its 1991 ruling, Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, in which it specified viability as "the earliest point at which the State's interest in fetal life is constitutionally adequate to justify a legislative ban on nontherapeutic abortions."

Since 2010, eight states have passed laws that appear to violate this standard. They ban abortion at 20 weeks, when viability is generally thought to occur not until 22 to 24 weeks. Legislators in those states have argued that, at 20 weeks, a fetus can feel pain — and that fetal pain, rather than viability, ought to be the standard by which abortion bans are judged.

A challenge to Arizona's 20-week ban has centered on this question, with supporters of that restriction arguing that fetal pain ought to be the standard for deciding when abortion can, and cannot, be outlawed.

The Arkansas measure does something, however, completely different: It attempts to redefine viability altogether. "Viability," Senate Bill 134 states, "means a medical condition that begins with a detectable fetal heartbeat."

In a weird way, the Arkansas law actually doesn't really try to challenge the viability standard as the 20-week bans do. Instead, it tries to rewrite what viability actually means.

Will that standard fly in the Supreme Court? It would near certainly require the justices to throw out Roe's central holding, that until "the end of the first trimester, the abortion decision and its effectuation must be left to the medical judgment of the pregnant woman's attending physician."

Still, it's a notably different tactic than other states have taken in their attempts to ban abortion. And it's one that, starting today, will likely wind its way up through the American legal system.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
Making family dinnertime happen
Deaf banjo player teaches thousands
New limbs for Pakistani soldiers
Play Videos
A veteran finds healing on a dog sled
Learn to make this twice-baked cookie
How to prevent 'e-barrassment'
Play Videos
Syrian refugee: 'I’m committed to the power of music'
The art of tortilla-making
Michael Bolton's cinematic serenade to Detroit
Play Videos
Circus nuns: These sisters are no act
5 ways to raise girls to be leaders
Cool off with sno-balls, a New Orleans treat
Next Story
Sarah Kliff · March 6, 2013

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.