The Washington Post

The Heritage Foundation’s argument on immigration is really about high school

The Heritage Foundation is out with a new report contending that illegal immigration imposes huge costs on U.S. taxpayers. You could easily read it as a treatise on Why Every American Kid Should Finish High School (And Then Keep Going).

The crux of the Heritage argument is this:

A Heritage study sees huge costs from immigration. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images) A Heritage study sees huge costs from immigration. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

1. Americans with a high school diploma or less receive a lot more benefit from government spending – including school for their kids, roads for their cars and transfer payments from social welfare programs – than they pay in taxes. That’s largely because those workers’ wages are so low.

2. More than half of immigrant households are headed by someone with a high school diploma or less.

3. Statistics suggest it is unlikely those immigrants will work their way up to higher-paying jobs even if they become citizens – and it is also unlikely that those immigrants’ children, even the ones who were born in America, will grow up to go to college.

4. Therefore, immigrants who have come to America without legal permission are likely to impose a net cost on taxpayers for generations to come.

“In reality,” Heritage authors Robert Rector and Jason Richwine write, “unlawful immigrants will be net tax consumers, placing a fiscal burden on other taxpayers not only in the first generation, but in the second generation as well.”

By the authors’ own logic, that same critique applies to any American, native- or foreign-born, who drops out of high school or doesn’t pursue higher education. Thus the broadest conclusions from the study aren’t about immigrants. They’re about the state of economic opportunity in the United States.

As the study puts it: “Many conservatives believe that if an individual has a job and works hard, he will inevitably be a net tax contributor (paying more in taxes than he takes in benefits). In our society, this has not been true for a very long time.”

Jim Tankersley covers economic policy for The Post. He's from Oregon, and he misses it.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
From clubfoot to climbing: Double amputee lives life of adventure
Learn to make traditional soup dumplings
Deaf banjo player teaches thousands
Play Videos
Unconventional warfare with a side of ale
The rise and fall of baseball cards
How to keep your child safe in the water
Play Videos
'Did you fall from heaven?': D.C.'s pick-up lines
5 ways to raise girls to be leaders
How much can one woman eat?
Play Videos
How to get organized for back to school
How to buy a car via e-mail
The signature drink of New Orleans
Next Story
Ezra Klein · May 6, 2013

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.