Everything you need to know before Yellen’s first press conference


Janet Yellen's first press conference is today

Janet Yellen will speak to reporters in her first press conference as chair of the Federal Reserve this afternoon, at an important moment for the nation's central bank. As the official unemployment rate gradually approaches 6.5 percent, the threshold that the Federal Open Market Committee set about a year ago, investors and economists are wondering what the Fed under Yellen will do after that goal is achieved -- and whether it still represents a good gauge for the economy.

The important question is whether Yellen and her colleagues think that the economy can still improve and whether they will try to stimulate more growth by continuing relatively accommodative policies. But a hawkish minority at the Fed is arguing that the financial crisis has more or less permanently damaged the economy, and that further improvement isn't possible. They want the central bank to signal that its work is nearly done and that it is ready to begin withdrawing support for the economy.

Most observers seem to think that the committee will announce another $10 billion reduction in the rate of new bond purchases, and that the announcement will include some creative way of indicating their commitment to low interest rates for the long term that doesn't involve the goal of 6.5 percent for unemployment:

A statement along these lines would be, more or less, a continuation of current policy.

Yet Matthew Boesler at Business Insider suggests that as the unemployment rate approaches the Fed's target, the central bank will not try to set a new goal for the economy. If so, today's statement might indicate they're ready to raise interest rates sooner. Some analysts feel that "full employment," defined as the point beyond which competition among firms over employees will lead to rising prices, is higher now than in the past. Like a patient who has recovered from a grave illness but remains maimed or blinded, the economy on this view just cannot recover the capacity for growth it had before the financial crisis, not anytime soon, anyway.

On the other hand, Karl Smith, Cardiff Garcia and others think that rising prices and inflation are worth enduring to encourage more workers back into the economy. Smith even suggests that the Fed explicitly increase its target for inflation for a short time. Yet the Fed has been very clear in the past about its commitment to holding inflation at or around 2 percent, as Tim Duy notes, so it is unlikely that the central bank will endorse such a policy now.

That previous commitment may make Yellen's job now more difficult. Wall Street might think that her and her colleagues have misjudged inflation, believing that it will increase sooner than the Fed anticipates. If so, they are less likely to take any commitment the Fed makes in its statement today seriously if that commitment is merely qualitative, in other words, if it isn't associated with a quantifiable goal of some kind, like the threshold of 6.5 percent for unemployment.

That's why the precise wording of today's statement is very important. If the Fed maintains its current threshold of 6.5 percent, that could mean members of committee are worried about increasing prices. But this could also be a sign that officials want to wait for more information or for input from two new members who are likely joining the committee soon.

If their statement is more qualitative, then pay attention to how the market responds: rising stock prices or falling bond yields will indicate that investors take the Fed at its word, and that they are confident in Yellen's ability to persuade the hawks on the committee to go along with a more aggressive program, despite the possibility of rising prices.

The economic forecasts included with the statement will show how the committee is thinking about the relationship between inflation and unemployment. Reporters might ask Yellen about winter weather as well, and her response could also reveal something about committee's view . If members think that poor economic performance in the past month or two has been due to the weather rather than fundamental weakness, that essential optimism could incline them to raising rates sooner. On the other hand, it now seems likely that the discouraging data was something more serious than a meteorological anomaly.

Max Ehrenfreund writes for Wonkblog and compiles Wonkbook, a daily policy newsletter. You can subscribe here. Before joining The Washington Post, Ehrenfreund wrote for the Washington Monthly and The Sacramento Bee.

business

wonkblog

Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Comments
Show Comments
Most Read Business

business

wonkblog

Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Next Story
Puneet Kollipara · March 19, 2014

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.