The Post’s View

Egypt’s generals grab for power

WHAT SHOULD HAVE been a moment of triumph in Egypt’s 17-month pursuit of a democratic future has turned dark and foreboding. In the runoff election for president that concluded Sunday, preliminary results point to a narrow edge for the Muslim Brotherhood’s candidate, Mohamed Morsi. That alone is a remarkable milestone for a once-banned Islamist group that spent decades in the shadows. But as the polls were closing, the ruling generals abruptly took action to neuter the presidency.

The council of generals who have run Egypt since Hosni Mubarak’s fall last year had pledged to hand over power to a civilian government by the end of this month. They renewed the promise Monday, but their words rang hollow. On Sunday, just as the polls closed, they published an interim constitution that strips the presidency of power. They seized authority to legislate until a new parliament is elected; to decide all matters related to the armed forces; and to veto a president’s decision to go to war. They granted themselves a significant role in the process of writing a permanent constitution. Taken together, they would leave Egypt’s new president hamstrung and toothless.

Washington Post Editorials

Editorials represent the views of The Washington Post as an institution, as determined through debate among members of the editorial board. News reporters and editors never contribute to editorial board discussions, and editorial board members don’t have any role in news coverage.

Read more

Latest Editorials

Stem cells, for good or evil

Stem cells, for good or evil

The health benefits of research outweigh the risk that someone might copy humans.

Kicking more of the habit

Kicking more of the habit

As Maryland weighs another tobacco tax increase, it can look to the success of its last one.

The Central African Republic can’t wait

The Central African Republic can’t wait

International aid can’t arrive soon enough for the Central African Republic.

Over time, perhaps a new legislature can be elected and a new constitution written. The generals proffered vague timelines. But for now, it appears the Egyptian revolution is being swallowed by the repressive forces of the past. After decades of rule in which the military built up wealth in key industries and commercial interests, they are clearly loath to give it up.

Official election results are to be announced Thursday. But with parliament dissolved, no constitution, the constitutional-drafting process disrupted and the presidency weakened, the path ahead looks unstable. Adding to the uncertainty was a cryptic comment made by Sameh Ashour, the head of the civilian council advising the generals, who told al-Jazeera that the next president would occupy the office “for a short period of time, whether or not he agrees.” He said a new constitution would bring forward someone else — a dark hint to Mr. Morsi that, even if he were to win the popular vote, he may not be permitted by the military to serve for long.

The military council may have calculated that the United States would look the other way while it usurped the first democratic election for president in Egypt’s history. After all, that’s been the administration’s pattern so far. On Monday, the State Department said that the military must honor its commitments to allow a transfer of power to civilian control and that its decisions “will have an impact on the nature of our engagement.” We hope the message is being stated more bluntly in private. If the generals suffocate Egyptian democracy in the cradle, U.S. military aid must cease.

Read what others are saying