Five Myths
Challenging everything you think you know

Five myths about tax reform

Greg Ip is the U.S. economics editor of the Economist and the author of “The Little Book of Economics: How the Economy Works in the Real World.”

As the nation’s leaders seek to keep the country from heading over the “fiscal cliff” — a set of mammoth year-end tax increases and spending cuts — nothing has proved more contentious than taxes. President Obama wants the rich to pay more; Republicans want to keep tax rates where they are. One popular proposal is to eliminate the tax code’s hundreds of loopholes and use the money to reduce the deficit without raising rates. But while tax reform is wonderful in theory, in practice it might not be as politically palatable — or economically effective — as advertised.

1. Tax reform has bipartisan support.

The night he was reelected, President Obama said “reforming our tax code” was among his second-term priorities. A few days later, House Speaker John Boehner said tax reform could help solve the national debt.

Five Myths

A feature from The Post’s Outlook section that dismantles myths, clarifies common misconceptions and makes you think again about what you thought you already knew.

Archive

More from Outlook

In Cleveland, the power of neighbors

In Cleveland, the power of neighbors

Do we know those living around us?

Five myths about missing children

Five myths about missing children

Are most abducted by strangers?

A daughter’s love from a distance

A daughter’s love from a distance

Will Mom’s illness bring us closer?

Gallery

Don’t be fooled. Republicans and Democrats mean different things when they talk about tax reform. Republicans are much more interested in lowering rates than in closing loopholes. During his presidential campaign, Mitt Romney said he would slash individual income tax rates by 20 percent across the board but was noncommittal about what tax breaks he’d scrap. When Obama says he’s for tax reform, he’s talking about limiting the value of deductions for the wealthy to 28 percent of their income. He has yet to propose lower tax rates and wants to raise them for the top 2 percent.

The two parties also have different ideas about which loopholes to eliminate. Obama, for example, wants to cap, but not eliminate, the tax break for charitable giving. His stimulus expanded the tax credit for college education, and he wants to make that permanent. Republicans generally want to protect lower rates for capital gains and dividends.

2. Eliminating tax breaks could raise more than $1 trillion a year in revenue.

To prove that there’s plenty of money available to lower rates, tax reform advocates such as the bipartisan Simpson-Bowles deficit commission often cite the annual cost of tax breaks as $1.1 trillion. One study by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service (CRS) estimated that eliminating all those tax breaks would generate enough revenue to lower the top rate from 39.6 percent to 23 percent.

But that same study noted how hard that would be. Most people benefit from some kind of tax break, making them very popular. Ending them would be administratively difficult and politically treacherous. Some are part of the social safety net, such as the earned income tax credit and the child tax credit, which benefit lower-income workers and families, as well as the exclusion of most Social Security benefits from taxation, which helps the elderly.

Other breaks encourage things most Americans approve of: charitable giving, saving for retirement and homeownership. The mortgage-interest deduction cost $75 billion in foregone tax revenue in 2011, but it’s also immensely popular — 33 million households claimed it, according to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center. Real estate agents, home builders and mortgage bankers would fight fiercely to preserve it.

After considering all these constraints, the CRS study concluded that it would be hard to gain more than $150 billion a year by eliminating tax breaks.

3. The 1986 tax overhaul is a good road map for reform.

“There’s a model for tax reform that supports economic growth,” Boehner said recently. “It happened in 1986, with a Democratic House run by Tip O’Neill and a Republican president named Ronald Reagan.”

Unfortunately, the very success of that act limits its use as a model. Reagan’s priority was to lower the top income tax rate, and he succeeded, bringing it to 28 percent from 50 percent. That option is no longer on the table; Obama has all but ruled out lowering the top rate. The only question is: Will it go up, and if so, by how much?

Loading...

Comments

Add your comment
 
Read what others are saying About Badges