Pang joins a growing list of authors who offer to help us battle our addiction to technology. This month also sees the publication of Catherine Steiner-Adair’s “The Big Disconnect: Protecting Childhood and Family Relationships in the Digital Age,” addressed to parents suffering anxiety about what their kids are doing on their computers in the privacy of their rooms and the sinkhole of time they fall into while doing it. For the aggravations and etiquette of online communication, see John Freeman’s “The Tyranny of Email: The Four-Thousand Year Journey to Your Inbox” or David Shipley and Will Schwalbe’s “SEND: Why People Email So Badly and How to Do It Better.”
Unlike some of these others, “The Distraction Addition” is not framed as a self-help book, despite the clunky how-to subtitle. It’s a thoughtful examination of the perils of our computing overdose and a historical overview of how technological advances change consciousness. A “professional futurist” with a doctorate in the history of science, Pang urges an approach that he calls “contemplative computing.” He asks that you pay Zen-like attention to “how your mind and body interact with computers and how your attention and creativity are influenced by technology.”
Pang’s first job is to disabuse you of the common misconception that doing two things at once allows you to get more done. What is commonly called multitasking is, in fact, switch tasking, and its deleterious effects on productivity are well documented. “When you’re constantly interrupted by external things — the phone, texts, people with ‘just one quick question,’ clients, children — by self-generated interruptions, or by your own efforts to multitask and juggle several tasks at once, the chronic distractions erode your sense of having control of your life. They don’t just derail your train of thought. They make you lose yourself.”
Pang doesn’t advocate returning to a pre-Internet world, some Eden of pure solitude, complete with birdsong. “If the Buddha was alive,” one of his interview subjects notes, “would he use Facebook or blog? I think he would.” Instead, he asks you to “take a more ecological view of your relationships with technologies and look for ways devices or media may be making specific tasks easier or faster but at the same time making your work and life harder.” For instance, he documents how using a washing machine is certainly easier than beating your clothes against rocks, and yet the modern housewife spends far more time doing laundry than her forebears. Similarly — as we’ve all experienced — the elaborate e-mail chains with endless reply-alls cluttering our inboxes are a less economical way to solve problems than picking up the phone or actually meeting face-to-face.
“The Distraction Addiction” is particularly fascinating on how technologies have changed certain fields of endeavor — often for the worse. For architects, computer-aided design has become essential but in some ways has cheapened the design process. As one architect puts it, “Architecture is first and foremost about thinking . . . and drawing is a [more] productive way of thinking” than CAD. Writing and research, too, often require slowness, indirection. According to Pang, Charles Darwin spent his most productive hours taking daily brisk walks around his estate. And it has been documented that people who read e-books retain less than those who read hard copies.
Somewhat less scintillating are Pang’s solutions for kicking the Internet habit. He recommends the usual behavior-modification approaches, familiar to anyone who has completed a smoking-cessation program. Keep logs to study your online profile and decide what you can knock out, download a program like Freedom that locks you out of your browser, or take a “digital Sabbath”: “Unless you’re a reporter, currency speculator, or emergency-department doctor, you’ll discover that your world doesn’t fall apart when you go offline.”
These solutions may seem obvious, but think of all of the diet books that recommend the revolutionary prescription of eating less if you want to lose weight. Easier said. Take heart: As Pang documents, in the future virtual imaging will allow us to see ourselves getting thinner as we diet and exercise, and studies have shown that actually seeing our better potential selves will keep us on the treadmill longer.
Congratulations, by the way, if you managed to read all of these words uninterrupted. As a reward, you could watch “Monk needs help opening a book” on YouTube, in which a professional of yore goes to a medieval help desk and complains about how much he preferred the scroll. Pang would probably approve, since his book brings us back to the cavemen and their first tools to make the point that adapting to technological advances has never been easy or automatic.
is the author of five novels, most recently “Love Bomb.” She is a professor at Rutgers University in Camden, N.J.