This antitrust state-action doctrine case was argued at the Supreme Court last week, and I’ve recorded a podcast about it for the Federalist Society.
Anything that hastens the death of the “who“/“whom” distinction is probably a good idea.
Antitrust scholars in an upcoming Supreme Court case argue for denying state-action antitrust immunity to essentially private licensing boards.
The Ninth Circuit says the San Diego Convention Center can choose to do its cleaning through its own employees.
Of course the law usually respects the corporate form. The law ought to do so whenever it’s convenient to do so, and ignore the corporate form whenever that’s convenient. And regular people like you and me should always look through the corporate form and see the people.
Let’s not reify the corporation: like Soylent Green, it’s people.
The federal constitution protects public-employee pension obligations, and many states provide additional protection -- which is all to the good. But California goes overboard.
How can you sail to Algeria?
Wahhabi, wasabi, kohlrabi
Hobby Lobby was rightly decided given RFRA, but I’m not sure that RFRA should be considered valid.