Boehner rejects Democrats’ $3 trillion deficit reduction proposal to ‘supercommittee’

The instant partisan rancor sparked by the leaked details of the two plans was a familiar retread of past rounds of deficit reduction talks, including a weeks-long discussion in the summer as Boehner and President Obama sought a “grand bargain” along the lines of what Democrats offered Tuesday.

Boehner eventually walked away from that deal over Obama’s insistence of $1.2 trillion in new tax revenue, but the president also faced a revolt among his own liberal supporters. Those party liberals reacted bitterly to this week’s news that the supercommittee’s Democrats were pushing similar offerings, even though the proposal was contingent on increased taxes on the wealthy and some corporations.

Gallery

Video

Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) said on Thursday the bipartisan supercommittee is having a hard time reaching a consensus to reduce the deficit. Boehner dismissed a recent proposal from Democrats that included cuts and tax increases, but did not rule out any tax increases, saying he's "committed" to reach an outcome.

Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) said on Thursday the bipartisan supercommittee is having a hard time reaching a consensus to reduce the deficit. Boehner dismissed a recent proposal from Democrats that included cuts and tax increases, but did not rule out any tax increases, saying he's "committed" to reach an outcome.

More on this Story

View all Items in this Story

“We continue to dangle the carrot of Social Security and Medicare,” said Rep. Raúl M. Grijalva (D-Ariz.). “They’re not biting. All it does is call into question where our party stands on those issues.”

If a bare majority of the panel agrees on a debt-reduction plan, it would move through Congress with special procedural protections against any amendment or filibuster in the Senate. If the committee fails, across-the-board reductions will be triggered in January 2013 and fall heavily on the Pentagon. This has prompted House GOP leaders to begin a series of intense education sessions for rank-and-file lawmakers, urging them to support whatever deal the committee reaches, considering it better than the deep cuts to the national security budget.

According to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office, the trigger would also endanger other fast-growing programs such as health care for veterans and Pell grants for college students.

With leaders in both parties now focusing on hitting the bare minimum of $1.2 trillion in savings, a bipartisan group of dozens of House members Republicans have emerged to push the supercommittee to aim much higher. With its letter expected to continue circulating Friday in search of more support, the bipartisan group is supporting cuts to discretionary programs and mandatory entitlements, as well as increased tax revenues.

“It’s a darn good start,” said Rep. Jim Cooper (D-Tenn.), a moderate Democrat who signed the letter and often criticizes both parties for intransigence, said of the dozens of members who had signed on. “This is essentially the voice of the back bench--the cry of the country, before we’re doomed.”

More from The Washington Post:

Occupy movement could be damaged by violent clashes

The Fix: Rick Perry skipping debates? Bad idea.

Fact Checker: Biden’s shocking job-loss figures

Chelsea Clinton-for-Congress talk quashed

Staff writers Lori Montgomery and Felicia Sonmez contributed to this report.

Loading...

Comments

Add your comment
 
Read what others are saying About Badges