Cabrera’s lawyers have appealed the decision, made in response to a lawsuit by the town’s mayor, and the Arizona Supreme Court is expected to rule on the case on Monday — in time for the city to print ballots the next morning.
“I speak English and I read and I write. I know my English is not proficient but I can understand and I can answer,” Cabrera, a U.S. citizen born in Arizona, told Reuters in an interview. “For San Luis, Arizona, it is enough.”
Immigrant rights activists say the court decision misunderstands a community that straddles both sides of the international frontier.
San Luis, Ariz., with its population of roughly 25,000, lies just over the steel border fence from San Luis Rio Colorado, in Mexico’s northern Sonora state, with a population of roughly 200,000. The two are considered by many residents as one and the same community.
Early each morning, a stream of agricultural workers cross into the United States from Mexico through the San Luis border crossing, bound for the expansive plots of farmland that surround the dusty streets of San Luis.
Late in the afternoon, those workers pile into white buses that carry them back to the border from the fields where they worked harvesting lettuce, alfalfa sprouts and other greens that fill supermarket shelves across the United States.
The activists argue that language-based restrictions are hostile to immigrants and drive a wedge between Latino communities and the rest of American society.
But proponents of making English the sole language of the state say the country needs a common tongue to promote national unity and cite the country’s decades-old experience of immigration and integration by generations of new Americans.
Though Cabrera was born in Yuma, she moved to Mexico when she was young and spent much of her childhood there. She returned to Arizona for the last three years of high school, eventually graduating from Yuma’s public Kofa High School.
It was in high school that she met the current town mayor, Juan Carlos Escamilla, who went on to file the lawsuit claiming she has insufficient command of the English language to hold elected office.
“He has the power, and uses the power for abuse,” said Cabrera, a stay-at-home mother for her two children, who has twice led efforts to recall Escamilla from office.
Dressed in a white jacket and white linen pants, Cabrera spoke slowly, choosing her words carefully. She speaks with intensity and passion, but sometimes in the wrong tense, or with the order of words scrambled.
She says that the cost of water has skyrocketed in the city, roughly tripling under Escamilla’s tenure, and that he fired a dozen city employees while padding the paychecks of his inner circle.
Escamilla did not show up for a scheduled interview, and did not respond to e-mail and phone inquiries made afterward.
San Luis City Attorney Glenn Gimbut said Cabrera’s accusations were “garbage,” and the case is fundamentally about the real meaning of the legal requirement that a public official read, write, and speak English.
“If you’re allowed to pick and choose qualifications as you feel like, where does this end?” Gimbut said. “Does this mean Osama bin Laden will now be on our ballot, never mind that he’s not a resident, never mind he’s not a citizen, never mind he’s dead?”
For her part, Cabrera says her potential constituency speaks mostly Spanish, and the uproar may prevent her from serving those people.
“I like to help the people, help my community,” Cabrera said. “Not only for the Hispanics, but for all race, all people.”