Corporations are sending more contributions to super PACs

Corporations appear to be embracing, albeit slowly, new campaign rules that allow them to make direct contributions to political groups.

The super PACs that have been playing a significant role this election season are getting more of their funding from corporate coffers — 23 percent, according to an analysis of federal records.

Graphic

See who is giving to each presidential candidate’s super PAC.
Click Here to View Full Graphic Story

See who is giving to each presidential candidate’s super PAC.

Graphic

CAMPAIGN FINANCE TRACKER: Explore the candidates’ campaign fundraising.
Click Here to View Full Graphic Story

CAMPAIGN FINANCE TRACKER: Explore the candidates’ campaign fundraising.

More on this Story

View all Items in this Story

That is up slightly from 19 percent in the 2010 cycle, when super PACs were first formed following the Supreme Court’s landmark Citizens United decision that year. In that case, the high court ruled that, under the First Amendment, the government could not restrict corporations from giving.

Democrats, including President Obama, criticized the ruling, raising the possibility that a flood of corporate money and special interest money could corrupt the political process.

Corporations, especially those with high public profiles, had largely refrained from donating to political groups, but the new data signal a possible shift, perhaps as executives become more comfortable with the new rules.

Among the donors, for example, is an Idaho company, Melaleuca, which gave $1 million to a political group backing GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney, according to federal records released this week. The company, which had $1 billion in sales last year, sells vitamins, environmentally friendly cleaning supplies and other household products.

Frank VanderSloot, the company’s chief executive and one of its biggest shareholders, is a top fundraiser for Romney’s campaign.

“We don’t like to rile people up, but if you’re afraid to take a stand then you probably don’t deserve the benefits of good government,” VanderSloot said. “We feel really strongly that we need an administration that understands how the economy works and that understands what made America great in the first place.”

Restore Our Future, the super PAC backing Romney, received about 28 percent of its funding last year from corporate donors, according to federal records. A spokeswoman for the group declined to comment.

Other corporate donors to the PAC include: Oxbow Carbon, a company run by Florida investor William Koch, one of four sons of the co-founder of Koch Industries; Contran Corp., owned by Texas billionaire and longtime conservative mega-donor Harold Simmons; and Hubbard Broadcasting, which owns TV stations in several states.

American Crossroads, one of the largest conservative super PACs, has received an increasing share of its funding from corporations — 39 percent last year, compared with 29 percent in 2010. The group was founded with help from Karl Rove, a one-time political adviser to former president George W. Bush.

Whiteco Industries, a private company that owns billboards, hotels and other real estate ventures, gave $1 million to Crossroads in November. The company’s billionaire owner, Dean White, has been a large contributor to Republicans in the past.

Many political interest groups that have formed to take advantage of new rules allowing corporate donations have both a super PAC, which must disclose donors, and an affiliated nonprofit group, which can keep them secret.

Loading...

Comments

Add your comment
 
Read what others are saying About Badges