Panetta has broad prescriptions for fixing the country. He is a staunch proponent of balancing the budget and has called on the federal government to borrow less money. He has also asked presidents and Congress alike to preserve the integrity of the U.S. Constitution and the separation of powers.
A wide range of admirers have praised Panetta's organizational and management skills and his prescriptions for the budget. However, though he dealt with national security issues as Clinton's chief of staff, he does not have a first-hand expertise in intelligence issues.
Killing bin Laden
Under Panetta's watch at the CIA, the world's most-wanted terrorist, al-Qaeda leader Osama bin-Laden was killed by U.S. special forces after years of painstaking intelligence work.
On May 1, 2011, President Obama ordered a risky special-operations raid on a compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan that U.S. intelligence officials had been monitoring for months. Inside the compound, they found and killed bin-Laden, the mastermind of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon and the target of a massive and frustrating 10-year manhunt.
bin Laden's body was removed from the compound, idenfitied positively through DNA evidenve, and buried after administering Islamic rites and rituals, at sea.
"I think we can all agree this is a good day for America. Our country has kept its commitment to see that justice is done. The world is safer. It is a better place because of the death of Osama bin Laden," Obama said.
Iraq
As a member of the Iraq Study Group, Panetta kept a close eye on the situation in that country. The group called for American forces to begin withdrawal from Iraq to prove that the U.S. will not stay there indefinitely. The group also called for extended diplomatic efforts and engagement across the Middle East, including with Iran and Syria.
Panetta suggested the U.S. set clear benchmarks for the Iraqi government to meet in order to continue to receive American support. He has argued that the end goal must be self-sovereignty and national reconciliation. For this reason, he favored a specific withdrawal date for U.S. troops from Iraq.
"The president and the Congress should make very clear to the Iraqis that there is no open-ended commitment to our involvement," he wrote in an op-ed in the New York Times. "As the Iraq Study Group recommended, there must be a price to be paid if the Iraqis continue to fail to make good on key reforms."
Furthermore, Panetta has argued that the case for the Iraq war was based on faulty intelligence. "In a democratic society, winning a war depends on the support of the people. And the support of the people depends on their trust that they are being told the truth by their leaders," he wrote.
Torture
Before joining the Obama administration, Panetta was an outspoken opponent of harsh interrogation tactics used on suspected terrorist detainees in the Bush administration. "We cannot and we must not use torture under any circumstances. We are better than that," he wrote in 2008 for the Washington Monthly.
The American public, Panetta argued, was convinced that torture is acceptable because it was afraid of future attacks on U.S. soil. However, Panetta said that the country's founders created a new nation that would "recognize that every individual has an inherent right to personal dignity." According to Panetta, torture is a violation of those basic rights. "We have preached these values to the world … it's what is supposed to make our leaders different from every tyrant, dictator, or despot."
At his confirmation hearings in January 2009, Panetta said that he would not allow the CIA to torture prisoners, to maintain secret prisons or to force the transfer of prisoners to countries that allow torture.
In August 2009, Panetta oversaw the release of a 2004 report on the holding of high-profile terror suspects by the CIA. The report indicated that several of the detainees were abused. The report, by the CIA's inspector general, said the agency's efforts to provide "systematic, clear and timely guidance" to interrogators was "inadequate at first" but "improved considerably."
Pelosi Controversy
In spring 2009, Panetta clashed with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) over when the speaker was informed that enhanced interrogation techniques such as waterboarding were used on terrorist detainees by CIA employees. In May 2009, Panetta released documents stating that Pelosi was informed in September 2002 of the use of such tactics; Pelosi fiercely denied that she had that knowledge until early 2003. Panetta said that the CIA's records could be erroneous, but defended his employees and agency.
"Let me be clear: It is not our policy or practice to mislead Congress. That is against our laws and our values. As the Agency indicated previously in response to Congressional inquiries, our contemporaneous records from September 2002 indicate that CIA officers briefed truthfully on the interrogation of Abu Zubaydah, describing 'the enhanced techniques that had been employed.' Ultimately, it is up to Congress to evaluate all the evidence and reach its own conclusions about what happened." Panetta stated.
But Pelosi's version of events had some Republicans calling for her ouster.
Iran
The CIA has played a big role in the Iranian nuclear negotiations. Iran disclosed that it had built a seperate uranium-enrichment plant in Qum in September 2009, an announcement that led America and its allies to impose tighter sanctions on the country.
The CIA had known about the plant for more than three years, and Panetta and his staff had worked with European intelligence agencies on a report about the plant in summer 2009. "It was built into a mountain; obviously that raised question marks,"
"We spent the next months trying to get better intel about what was going on there ... and conducting covert operations into that area," Panetta told Time magazine in October 2009
Show less