Video: President Obama meets with Isareli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House and reassures him that the U.S. "will always have Israel's back."
Fear of Iran’s intent
Netanyahu, in his speech late Monday, said his government would prefer a peaceful resolution if Iran could be persuaded to abandon its nuclear ambitions. But if that doesn’t happen, he said, Israel was prepared to act unilaterally to stop Iran from acquiring the bomb — an act that he said would embolden Iran and its allied militant groups and raise the specter of nuclear terrorism and a nuclear arms race in the Middle East.
President Obama say he prefers to use diplomacy to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons, but he is making it clear that he won't "hesitate to use force" when necessary to defend the U.S. and its interests.
More from PostPolitics
“It is what it is,” the former New York congressman said.
FACT CHECKER | A GOP lawmaker cited Harry Reid’s false claim that Mitt Romney paid no taxes at the IRS hearing. He asked how Reid “obtained” his information.
“We must define the nature and scope of this struggle, or else it will define us,” the president said.
“Think how they’ll behave tomorrow with nuclear weapons,” Netanyahu told AIPAC. “Iran will be even more reckless and a lot more dangerous.”
While acknowledging that a military strike would be costly, he said: “I think we ought to start talking about the cost of not stopping Iran.”
Israel, which has its own undeclared arsenal of nuclear weapons, has concluded that Iran’s leadership has decided to pursue one as well. International inspectors have uncovered evidence to suggest a military intent for a program that Iran says is meant only for civilian power purposes.
Those concerns were underscored Monday at a meeting of the United Nations’ nuclear watchdog in the Austrian capital. Yukiya Amano, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said the U.N. group has “serious concerns regarding possible military dimensions to Iran’s nuclear program.”
He voiced concern about Iran’s recent tripling of its production of a more-purified form of enriched uranium.
But the Obama administration is not convinced that Iran’s leaders have decided to develop a nuclear weapon, although U.S. diplomats have worked with European allies to implement oil and banking sanctions against Iran until it gives up its uranium-enrichment program.
Points of convergence
Before the Oval Office meeting, Netanyahu said: “Americans know that Israel and the United States share common values, that we defend common interests, that we face common enemies. Iran’s leaders know that, too. For them, you’re the Great Satan, we’re the Little Satan. For them, we are you, and you’re us.”
Obama and Netanyahu have been at odds in the past, particularly over how to revive the moribund Israeli-Palestinian peace process.
But the leaders share many of the same security goals. As Obama noted in his address Sunday to AIPAC, U.S. military aid to Israel has increased during each year of his administration.
Obama also has thrown the weight of U.S. diplomacy behind Israel. Last fall, he opposed the Palestinian bid for statehood at the United Nations. With the Palestinian peace negotiations a secondary issue, Obama and Netanyahu appeared more at ease than they did a year ago.
Israeli officials described the talks, which included a half-hour session just between the two leaders, as cordial. Obama and Netanyahu expressed resolve about preventing the emergence of a nuclear-armed Iran and promised an “open channel” going forward, a senior Israeli diplomat said.
Obama also publicly assured Netanyahu that the United States “will always have Israel’s back” when it comes to security, and the Israeli leader thanked him for his strong speech before AIPAC the previous day.
In those remarks, Obama declared that “all elements of American power” were still available to stop Iran’s enrichment program.
Heading into the meeting, Netanyahu and his national security advisers hoped to hear more explicitly from Obama about how he viewed the goal of the Iranian nuclear program and his timeline for moving against it.
The senior administration official said, “Our red line is a nuclear weapon, and we didn’t change our policy.”
“They didn’t press on the red line, but one thing they did press on was intent,” the official said. “They don’t trust this [Iranian] regime at all, and we don’t either. But we believe the pressure is mounting and that Iran may take some steps to relieve it.”
Staff writer David Nakamura contributed to this report.
The Post Most: PoliticsMost-viewed stories, videos and galleries int he past two hours
Loading...
Comments