“This is a really tremendous milestone, a day I will never forget,” said Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), the first openly lesbian senator.
President Obama praised supportive senators and called on House Republicans to quickly permit a vote.
“One party in one house of Congress should not stand in the way of millions of Americans who want to go to work each day and simply be judged by the job they do,” Obama said in a statement. “Now is the time to end this kind of discrimination in the workplace, not enable it.”
But ENDA faces a steep uphill climb in a GOP-controlled House still dominated by social conservatives. House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) and his lieutenants think the measure is too broad and is unnecessary; they think that the people ENDA is intended to protect are already covered under existing federal, state and private workplace protection laws.
Twenty-one states and the District of Columbia have laws prohibiting workplace discrimination based on sexual orientation, while 17 states and the District also bar discrimination based on gender identity. Hundreds of the nation’s largest companies also have similar bans.
The campaign to enact federal workplace protections for gay men and lesbians began 17 years ago, and supporters have struggled ever since to earn a vote. But in the latest sign of shifting public opinion, every member of the Senate Democratic caucus present Thursday was joined by 10 Republican senators to approve the measure. In 1996 — the first time the Senate voted on a bill similar to ENDA — Sens. Orrin G. Hatch (R-Utah) and John McCain (R-Ariz.) voted no. On Thursday, they voted yes.
“This is the right thing to do,” McCain told reporters before he cast his vote.
Opponents stayed largely silent until Thursday, when Sen. Daniel Coats (R-Ind.) said on the Senate floor that ENDA “diminishes” the religious freedom of organizations and employers who may feel compelled to hire people who hold religious views contrary to the organization.
“I oppose discrimination of any kind, and that includes discrimination, however, also, of individuals or institutions for their faith and values, which often gets lost and has been lost in this discussion,” Coats said.
The conservative Family Research Council also warned that ENDA “would transform the workplace into an environment in which certain self-identifications and conduct must be given special privileges by employers” that might require people to suppress religious or moral views.
Those concerns are shared by Boehner, who reiterated his years-long opposition to the proposal in a statement this week. But supporters said Thursday that the House version of ENDA has at least 193 GOP co-sponsors and that they are pursuing dozens more. Congressional Democrats also suggested that socially conservative Republicans are increasingly out of step with most Americans.
“Our history books are littered with those public figures who said, we just can’t end that discrimination based on race; we can’t end that discrimination based on age, based on disability, based on gender. Think about their place in history today,” said Sen. Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.).