Supreme Court health-care ruling likely to have long-term fallout

Though no one outside the Supreme Court has an inkling how it is going to rule on President Obama’s health-care law, the political fallout — at least initially — is easy to predict.

If the law is upheld in full, the decision will be hailed as a triumph for Obama and his leadership. If it is struck down entirely, Republicans will claim vindication in their unanimous opposition to what they see as a massive overreach of government.

Video

As the nation awaits a decision from the Supreme Court on the constitutionality of President Obama's flagship health care law, Yale University Law Professor Akhil Amar joined the "CBS This Morning: Saturday" co-hosts to examine the issues the justices are considering.

As the nation awaits a decision from the Supreme Court on the constitutionality of President Obama's flagship health care law, Yale University Law Professor Akhil Amar joined the "CBS This Morning: Saturday" co-hosts to examine the issues the justices are considering.

More from PostPolitics

It's not just Republicans up in arms about Benghazi

It's not just Republicans up in arms about Benghazi

THE FIX | More than half of Americans say the Obama administration is trying to cover up the facts of the attack, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll.

IRS’s Lois Lerner to plead the Fifth

IRS’s Lois Lerner to plead the Fifth

The IRS official who first disclosed the agency's improper targeting of conservative groups will invoke her right not to incriminate herself.

Has anyone been ‘fired’ because of the Benghazi attacks?

Has anyone been ‘fired’ because of the  Benghazi attacks?

FACT CHECKER | Sen. Rand Paul claims no one has been fired because of the Benghazi attacks. So what happened to those State Department officials who lost their jobs?

Coburn: Tornado aid must be offset

Coburn: Tornado aid must be offset

Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) will insist that any federal aid to deal with the tornado in his home state must be offset by budget cuts.

Read more

And if only part of the law survives, both sides will scramble to reposition. The Obama administration and its allies will do their best to protect what is left. Republicans have vowed to repeal it all as soon as they can, and eventually, to offer an alternative.

However the court comes down, most Americans are not likely to be happy with the result. In a poll released Monday, the Pew Research Center asked about all three scenarios and found that fewer than half of those surveyed would be satisfied with any of them.

The one that garnered the most support — at 44 percent — was throwing out the entire law. Upholding the entire law got the least, at 39 percent. And 40 percent said they would be in favor of striking only the most controversial aspect, which is a mandate requiring individuals who do not receive coverage from their employers or the government to buy it from private insurance companies, or pay a fine.

The Pew survey also found that public preferences tracked sharply along party lines, with Republicans hoping the court will throw out the law and Democrats wanting it to stand.

Partisanship is also certain to drive the initial reaction to the decision, which will land right in the middle of an intensely competitive presidential race.

“It will be heavily politicized, regardless of whatever decision the court makes. It will be overstated, exaggerated,” said former Senate Democratic leader Tom Daschle, who was Obama’s initial choice for health and human services secretary.

In the longer run, however, each of those scenarios raises a whole new set of political and policy questions for the two parties. That means the real implications of the decision are not likely to become apparent until next year.

“No one is going to be in a mood for any fixes, certainly before the election,” said Jonathan Gruber, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology economist who advised the Obama administration in formulating the Affordable Care Act. Gruber also consulted with then-Gov. Mitt Romney, when he was putting together the 2006 Massachusetts health-care law that has many of the same characteristics.

Once the election is behind them, both parties will have to come to grips with either making sure what’s left of the law is working, or deciding whether there is a better way to address the problems of a health-care system that leaves 16 percent of the population without coverage and is gobbling nearly 18 percent of the gross national product.

“It will take a while for people to take a deep breath and say, ‘Okay, now what?’ ” said Gail Wilensky, a critic of the law who was a top health-care policymaker in both Bush administrations. “Then we get back to the serious fight: Is this reflective of the direction we want the economy to go? Is this reflective of the direction we want the government to go?”

Loading...

Comments

Add your comment
 
Read what others are saying About Badges