The Washington Post

Supreme Court lets stand an Oklahoma ruling that a state abortion law is unconstitutional

The Supreme Court decided Tuesday not to review a ruling by Oklahoma’s highest court that requiring women to undergo a narrated ultrasound exam before obtaining an abortion is unconstitutional.

The decision marks the second time this month that the nation’s highest court has declined to take up a challenge to the Oklahoma Supreme Court’s rulings on abortion. On Nov. 4, the court opted not to review a decision by the state’s high court that a major portion of Oklahoma’s ­restrictive abortion law is unconstitutional because it effectively bans all drug-induced abortions.

The Center for Reproductive Rights filed a legal challenge on behalf of three Oklahoma plaintiffs — a nonprofit advocacy group, an abortion doctor and a reproductive health-care facility — in April 2010 to block the ultrasound law, which would have forced every woman seeking an abortion in the state to undergo an ultrasound, have the image placed in front of her and listen to a state-mandated script.

A district court judge granted a temporary restraining order against the law in May 2010 and a permanent injunction in March 2012. The Oklahoma Supreme Court upheld the lower court’s ruling in December.

Nancy Northup, president and chief executive of the Center for Reproductive Rights, welcomed Tuesday’s decision.

“A woman’s personal, private medical decisions should be made in consultation with the health-care professionals she trusts, without interference by politicians who presume to know better,” Northup said in a statement. “Today the U.S. Supreme Court has let stand another strong decision by the Oklahoma courts protecting a woman’s constitutional right to make her own decisions about whether to continue a pregnancy from the ­intrusion of politicians opposed to her rights and indifferent to her health.”

Many other states have passed legislation requiring ultrasounds before an abortion can be performed, but not all of the laws are the same. For example, while some efforts have pushed for transvaginal ultrasounds, most require less-invasive external ­ultrasounds. Most of the laws don’t require the woman to view the image or the doctor to describe it, as the Oklahoma law did.

According to the Guttmacher Institute, laws similar to the Oklahoma ultrasound law currently exist in Louisiana, Texas and Wisconsin.

Aaron Blake contributed to this report.

Juliet Eilperin is The Washington Post's White House bureau chief, covering domestic and foreign policy as well as the culture of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. She is the author of two books—one on sharks, and another on Congress, not to be confused with each other—and has worked for the Post since 1998.


Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read


Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
Sleep advice you won't find in baby books
In defense of dads
Scenes from Brazil's Carajás Railway
Play Videos
For good coffee, sniff, slurp and spit
How to keep your child safe in the water
How your online data can get hijacked
Play Videos
How to avoid harmful chemicals in school supplies
Full disclosure: 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, 1 ghoul
How much can one woman eat?
Play Videos
What you need to know about Legionnaires' disease
How to get organized for back to school
Pandas, from birth to milk to mom

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.