Supreme Court turns down appeal from Siegelman

Former Alabama Gov. Don Siegelman’s attempt to challenge his public corruption conviction was turned down by the Supreme Court. (Dave Martin/ASSOCIATED PRESS)

The Supreme Court on Monday turned down former Alabama governor Don Siegelman’s attempt to challenge his public corruption conviction.

Siegelman and former Alabama hospital executive Richard Scrushy were found guilty on charges Scrushy made $500,000 in political contributions to one of Siegelman’s favored causes so that the governor would name him to a state hospital board.

Siegelman, who did not benefit financially from the transactions, argued that the court should set a higher standard for when political contributions can be prosecuted as bribes.

“Most if not all officials are responsive in at least some degree to those who contribute,” Siegelman told the court in his brief.

The justices made no comment in turning down the case. Justice Elena Kagan recused herself, likely because of her work on the case while she was President Obama’s solicitor general.

Siegelman, a Democrat, was supported by more than 100 former state attorneys general who asked the court to review the case in order to impose higher standards. As it stands, they argued, the law gives “unwarranted latitude to prosecutors in targeting, for whatever reasons, those politicians and contributors whose lives and careers they desire to imperil.”

But the Obama administration said a standard that required an “express” agreement between the parties would be too much.

“Under a standard that requires not just a quid pro quo but one that is verbally spelled out with all the “i”s dotted and “t”s crossed, all but the most careless public officials will be able to avoid criminal liability for exchanging official action for campaign contributions,” Solicitor General Donald B. Verrilli Jr. wrote.

Siegelman was sentenced to seven years in prison in 2007. He was released after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit threw out two counts of his conviction.

He will likely return to prison after resentencing before a federal district judge.

Scrushy’s sentence was reduced after the appeals court’s action. He remained in prison and is scheduled for release this summer.

Robert Barnes has been a Washington Post reporter and editor since 1987. He has covered the Supreme Court since November 2006.


Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read Politics


Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.