Al Kamen
Al Kamen
In the Loop

The man without a binder

The value of a dollar

Financial disclosures can be such pesky things for folks in the political limelight.

More from PostPolitics

Carney: Senior aides knew about IRS probe in April but did not tell Obama

Carney: Senior aides knew about IRS probe in April but did not tell Obama

Chief of staff Denis McDonough and others learned of the investigation the week of April 16, spokesman said.

A bushel of Pinocchios for IRS’s Lois Lerner

A bushel of Pinocchios for IRS’s Lois Lerner

FACT CHECKER | As more information is disclosed, the factual gaps in Lois Lerner’s statements become clearer.

Can the White House hold the line on IRS, Benghazi and AP controversies?

Can the White House hold the line on IRS, Benghazi and AP controversies?

THE FIX | The White House isn't backing down on the IRS or Benghazi. At least not yet.

Read more

What a relief, then, not to have a salary high enough to require them, such as the one Burson Taylor Snyder, deputy chief of staff to Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), is making. Her husband, Pete Snyder, just announced that he is running for lieutenant governor of Virginia.

Like any candidate, he might prefer to keep personal details close to the vest as long as he can — though he’ll eventually have to fill out a candidate’s disclosure form — particularly since, as one of the founders of the GOP firm New Media Strategies, he’s probably worth millions (according to a 2007 form his wife filed as a House staffer, his stake in the company was worth between $5 million and $25 million).

Under Senate ethics rules, Snyder would have been required to file another financial disclosure form — which also would list her husband’s assets and income, possibly including those associated with his investment firm, Disruptor Capital — if she made more than $119,554.

But with a salary under the minimum — just barely — she doesn’t quite meet the reporting requirement. According to salary-tracking service LegiStorm, she pulled down $119,552.88 from April 1, 2011, through March 31, 2012, and appears on track to make that same amount in calendar year 2012, though the pay records aren’t yet available.

That’s exactly $1.12 (you can barely buy a pack of gum for less than that!) under the bar for disclosure. Coincidence?

Snyder wouldn’t comment.

But it seems that figure might make her underpaid, at least according to some measures. Her counterpart in the office of Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), for example, makes $133,000 annually, and her predecessor in Blunt’s office made even more, about $160,000 a year.

Snyder would hardly be pioneering new territory here. “We’ve seen this process before,” says Jock Friedly, LegiStorm’s president and founder. “A lot of people would rather not disclose if they don’t have to.”

Such disclosures have proved politically embarrassing, as when House records on Callista Gingrich’s finances revealed that she and hubby Newt Gingrich had a line of credit at Tiffany’s.

So when it comes to revealing information that could be used by political foes, it seems less really is more.

With Emily Heil

The blog: washingtonpost.com/
intheloop. Twitter: @InTheLoopWP.

Loading...

Comments

Add your comment
 
Read what others are saying About Badges