Correction:

A previous version of this article incorrectly described the team’s “magic number” at that point. The version said that any combination of Nationals wins and Atlanta Braves losses equaling 11 would give Washington the National League East title. In fact, the number represented the combination required to eliminate the Braves from contention. The Philadelphia Phillies still had a mathematical chance to win the division, though they no longer do. This version has been updated. 

A magic number for the Nationals and their fans to believe in

Video: The Washington Post’s Adam Kilgore joins Post Sports Live to identify the main areas of concern for the Nationals as they head into the postseason for the first time in team history.

Since professional baseball returned to Washington seven years ago — heck, even when it was here all those miserable decades before that — there has been precious little magic surrounding the local team. In Septembers past, the Washington Nationals would be part of pennant race baseball only tangentially, beating one team that was contending, rolling over for another, on the fringes of the sport’s most riveting time of year. Irrelevance outweighed tension, time after time.

But this week, the Nationals are entering territory that has not been part of a reasonable discussion in Washington since the Great Depression. By sweeping the New York Mets last week, they dropped their magic number (and we’ll get to what this is) for eliminating the Atlanta Braves from contention to 11 games. Eleven measly games.

Nationals Journal

Nationals Journal

Insight on the Nationals and all the latest news from Post reporters Adam Kilgore and James Wagner.

They have 17 to play. They lead the Braves, their closest pursuers, by 61 / 2 games in the standings — and the Braves needed to win Friday night and Saturday afternoon to get that close. The division championship, and the corresponding spot in the playoffs, is edging tantalizingly close — close enough that, at some point during a seven-game homestand that begins Tuesday, a crowd at Nationals Park might be looking down on a hugging group of players, celebrating along with them, champagne to come. And that means fall could be fundamentally altered in Washington, where “autumn” and “Redskins season” have been synonymous since 1937.

In other cities, Boston or Philadelphia or New York — especially New York — such a baseball story line could be something of an expectation. But here in poor, poor Washington, this is all so new.

Consider: The District’s major league team, when it was officially dubbed the Senators, last won its league (American) in a year (1933) when Franklin D. Roosevelt was was serving the first of his four presidential terms. Over the next 27 seasons, that same franchise posted all of four winning seasons. (By way of comparison, those Senators lost 95 or more games five times.) The cumulative winning percentage over that time: .447.

That team, mercifully to some, left town and became the Minnesota Twins. It was immediately replaced by an expansion outfit that was no better. In the next 11 seasons, there were 10 losers and one winner. The franchise bolted to Texas. Thus, 38 seasons in which the Senators lost 797 more games than they won and never reached the postseason were followed by 33 summers without any baseball at all.

Which was worse? Hard to say. In 2005, when the Expos relocated from Montreal and became the Nationals, they finished an even 81-81. But given how it happened — an enthralling first half of the season in which they went 50-31, followed by a collapse in the second half in which they went, symmetrically and painfully, 31-50 — it was difficult.

Some fan bases will tell you they have endured more misery. But think about it: There are 30 major league franchises representing 28 cities. The city with the next-longest postseason drought is Kansas City, where the Royals won the World Series in 1985 and haven’t made the playoffs since. Washington has a 53-year (dis)advantage on that.

Loading...

Comments

Add your comment
 
Read what others are saying About Badges