Correction:

A previous version of this article incorrectly described the team’s “magic number” at that point. The version said that any combination of Nationals wins and Atlanta Braves losses equaling 11 would give Washington the National League East title. In fact, the number represented the combination required to eliminate the Braves from contention. The Philadelphia Phillies still had a mathematical chance to win the division, though they no longer do. This version has been updated. 

A magic number for the Nationals and their fans to believe in

Video: The Washington Post’s Adam Kilgore joins Post Sports Live to identify the main areas of concern for the Nationals as they head into the postseason for the first time in team history.

Similarly, the ballads of the Pirates (no winning seasons since 1992), the Cubs (no World Series titles since 1908), the Indians (no World Series titles since 1948) are tried and true, part of baseball lore and the fabric of Pittsburgh, Chicago and Cleveland, respectively. But middle-aged Pittsburghers still have the “We Are Family” Pirates of 1979, world champions. They still have Roberto Clemente and Willie Stargell, Hall of Famers. Clevelanders have seven postseason appearances since 1995 alone. They have Bob Feller and Roberto Alomar, Hall of Famers. Cubs fans, for all their over-documented heartache, have 25 winning seasons since 1933.

What does Washington have? Walter Johnson and the 1924 World Series championship, and the group that won the American League but lost the Series the year after. Joe Cronin and the 1933 American League pennant, a team that lost the Series in five games to the New York Giants. And that’s about it.

Nationals Journal

Nationals Journal

Insight on the Nationals and all the latest news from Post reporters Adam Kilgore and James Wagner.

So it was odd earlier in the week, when the Nationals completed their sweep of the Mets, to listen to players in the visiting clubhouse at Citi Field trying to downplay what was in the process of happening. The Nationals not only hold a commanding lead over the Braves, they have the best record in baseball.

“I don’t even know what the lead is, to tell you the truth,” third baseman Ryan Zimmerman said.

On that night, it had grown to 81 / 2 games. And the “magic number” dropped to 11.

That number will continue appear on the Post’s front page until the Nationals clinch the division. (Yes, we know this could be seen as a jinx. But dream for a minute.)

Here’s the formula: G + 1 - W(a) - L(b) where G is the total number of games in the season (162), W(a) is the number of wins for the team in first place and L(b) is the number of losses for the team in second. After the Nationals’ 5-4 loss Saturday, W(a) is 89 (and a Washington team hasn’t won 90 games since those 1933 Senators). L(b) is 63, the Braves’ losses. And the equation becomes 162 + 1 - 89 - 63 = 11.

The way to think of what’s to come, as the Nationals play one more game in Atlanta Sunday night before returning home to face the Los Angeles Dodgers and Milwaukee Brewers, is that any combination of Braves losses and Nationals wins equaling 11 will mathematically eliminate the Braves from contention. With each Nats win, the number will go down one. With each Braves loss, it will go down one more — with the outside possibility that the Philadelphia Phillies, should they overtake the Braves, could affect the number as well.

There is scant evidence that, 79 years ago, the phrase “magic number” existed. In 1933, as the Senators closed in on the American League pennant, the Post noted that “Only four more victories in their remaining 11 games are needed by the Nats to clinch the pennant beyond mathematical doubt, even if the Yankees should win all of their 15 remaining games.”

That, then, is the number accompanying this story explained. Barring something unexpected, it should decrease over the next week. If and when it hits zero, hang on — because Washington will be in for something it hasn’t experienced in nearly eight decades.

Loading...

Comments

Add your comment
 
Read what others are saying About Badges