Legal action by the Redskins over their salary cap reduction, without the union, remains a possibility, that person said, without indicating whether Tuesday’s opening of the NFL free agent market is a deadline for the team to take such a step. But it’s not clear what the team will do.
The new developments in the salary cap case come amid indications that the hopes of Redskins officials of recouping any of their lost cap space have dimmed in recent days.
The team did some offseason business Saturday, re-signing tight end Logan Paulsen and fullback Darrel Young to three-year contracts and agreeing in principle on a one-year deal to retain outside linebacker Rob Jackson. Young’s contract includes a $1 million signing bonus and, with incentives, could be worth $6.2 million. Terms of Paulsen’s and Jackson’s contracts were not immedately available.
The Redskins were an estimated $3 million above the salary cap before reaching the deals with Paulsen, Young and Jackson. All three players would have been eligible for restricted free agency when the market opens on Tuesday.
The team also has agreed to terms on a deal to bring back starting left guard Kory Lichtensteiger, who was an unrestricted free agent.
Lichtensteiger announced the agreement via Twitter, saying “Just wanted to let Redskin Nation know I am going to be around for a while. Just agreed to terms on a deal!! HTTR”
The contract, which still needs to be signed, is for five years, a source said. The financial terms weren’t immediately known.
According to one person with knowledge of the union’s thinking, the NFLPA would continue to welcome a joint legal effort with the Redskins on the salary cap case.
“The real question is why [the Redskins] didn’t seek to join in some action by the players,” the person said. “After all, the players’ theory is that [the Redskins] didn’t violate the rules and were punished for not agreeing to the conspiracy. . . . I’m a bit at a loss why they wouldn’t. At the very least, if you were [the Redskins], wouldn’t you cooperate with the players’ case?”
The person said there had been no dialogue between the union and the team on the subject but the Redskins still could join the union’s appeal of its collusion case against the league and teams.
The other person familiar with the situation confirmed that the union would be interested in joint legal action with the team but said the Redskins haven’t given that serious consideration because they “don’t think there was collusion.”
The Redskins are to absorb the remaining $18 million of their salary cap penalty this year. They were given a $36 million cap reduction over two years by the NFL last March, with the consent of the union, for the way in which they structured players’ contracts during the uncapped year. The Redskins and Dallas Cowboys, who were given a $10 million cap reduction over two years by the NFL, took the matter to arbitration last year but had their case dismissed.
The union filed a collusion case in federal court in Minnesota last year accusing the league and teams of operating with a secret salary cap in the uncapped year. A federal judge twice sided with the league and ruled that the union waived its right to make such a claim and the case cannot move forward. The union is appealing.
One person who had been in contact with the Redskins in recent days said that team officials indicated there had been a setback late in the week in their efforts in the salary cap case. It was not clear what the setback was. But if the Redskins are unable to regain salary cap space, they would have to make moves to get under the cap and would be limited in what they could do in free agency.
There have been “many discussions over the past year” between the NFL and the Redskins regarding the salary cap case, a person familiar with the league’s position on the matter said. But as of Friday night the team had not delivered a direct threat to the league in recent weeks about going to court, the person said. That person said the Redskins’ salary cap reduction remains in place and the league has no intention of budging on the penalty.