Mike Wise
Mike Wise
Columnist

Redskins name goes before federal trademark board, but for this writer, there’s no debate

Ray K. Saunders/THE WASHINGTON POST - Daniel Snyder, Bruce Allen and the Washington franchise are on the wrong side of history with their insistence on keeping the Redskins nickname.

I want to see both sides in this. I really do. But two hours after the meaning of the name of Washington’s pro football team was vigorously debated before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board last week in Alexandria, I better understood why I will always be aligned with those who want the name changed.

On one side, in the middle of the courthouse’s atrium, stood the well-coiffed, handsome representative of the team, Bruce Allen — son of George, the late legendary coach; ballboy for Sonny and Billy and the rest of the Over the Hill Gang. Bruce has worked for other NFL franchises, but the team’s current general manager has, deep down, always been what he calls a “proud Redskin,” through and through.

The Insider

The Insider

Insight on the Redskins and all the latest news from Post reporters Mike Jones and Mark Maske.

Join the discussion in our forums

Join the discussion in our forums

Talk about your favorite teams, start your own debates and discuss all the latest news in our new forums.

On the other side, sitting quietly a few feet away, patiently waiting her turn before the phalanx of cameras and voice recorders, was a bespectacled, regal American Indian woman, Suzan Shown Harjo — great-granddaughter of Cheyenne Chief Bull Bear, daughter of U.S. soldier Freeland Douglas, a decorated code talker who saw combat in Italy with the U.S. Army’s 45th Infantry Division in World War II; proud American, through and though.

“The argument has always been the same,” Harjo once told me. “ ‘We are honoring you,’ they say. ‘No, you’re not,’ we reply. ‘Shut up,’ they say. That’s pretty much the divide.”

Harjo is 67. She doesn’t need this. She has been fighting forever, it seems, returning land to her people, curating museums, advocating for native peoples’ rights almost all her life. Twenty years now she has been coming to these court proceedings, alongside attorneys who work for free because they believe that rich, white owners don’t get to decide what honors or doesn’t honor an ethnic minority.

This was Bruce Allen’s first day in court. This is what he said when asked if the case was really about money:

“You would have to ask the, uh, I think they’re called the plaintiffs in this case, what their motives are.”

Memo to Allen, Daniel Snyder and the gang: The American Indians who feel disparaged by your team’s name aren’t about to open a Redskins store in the foyer of FedEx Field once the team is again stripped of its trademark rights as it was in 1999 before a higher court overturned the decision on appeal.

They have no interest in marketing Robert Griffin III’s jersey or even monetary reparations for the billions made of a red-pigmented man on a helmet or Barcalounger. Harjo, Amanda Blackhorse and the other, uh, plaintiffs just want you to stop calling yourselves Redskins, because it’s a slur.

“In this day and age, could you foresee a team called the Blackskins?” I asked Allen on Thursday. A three-second pause later, he uncomfortably replied, “I . . . I don’t know.”

I’ll help him: No, America wouldn’t stand for a team called the Blackskins — or the Mandingos, the Brothers, the Yellowskins, insert your ethnic minority here.

Allen gave as strong a defense of why this is important to him and the team as he could. But at one juncture he said, “I know there are Native Americans who are very proud of us, who are fans of our football team.” And unfortunately for him that came across like a man accused of racism might resort to the old “Wait, I have black friends.”

Loading...

Comments

Add your comment
 
Read what others are saying About Badges