With Chen Guangcheng news on Twitter, China’s censors lost control

The Chen episode follows closely another blockbuster in China — the fall from power of the once high-flying Chongqing Party boss Bo Xilai. That political story became the most watched and most reported in a generation.

With precious few official announcements about Bo beyond the early, terse statement that he was being investigated for “serious discipline violations” while his wife is a murder suspect, the Bo family scandal has mostly unfolded online.

Gallery

Latest stories from Foreign

Sibling spy intrigue puts spotlight on S. Korea’s wary eye toward defectors

Sibling spy intrigue puts spotlight on S. Korea’s wary eye toward defectors

Yoo Woo-sung made strides in Seoul. Then his sister told interrogators he was on a mission for the North.

N. Korea fires 3 missiles into the sea

N. Korea fires 3 missiles into the sea

The launch, reported by South Korea, tests the recent calm on the peninsula after a period of heightened tension.

English-language proposal has French up in arms

Many are outraged by a bill that would allow French universities to teach more courses in English.

E.U. farmers fear trade deal could open door to GMO crops

E.U. farmers fear trade deal could open door to GMO crops

Concerns over genetically modified seeds could cripple talks that aim to boost European, U.S. economies.

Dollar rises in socialist Venezuela

Dollar rises in socialist Venezuela

After losing value for years, U.S. currency is thriving in the fast-wilting economy Hugo Chavez left behind.

Stories posted and reposted online have looked into the Bo family’s financial holdings, the dealings of extended family members, and even the overseas university partying habits of Bo’s son, Bo Guagua.

In both the Chen case and the Bo Xilai story, the official state-run media has tried to squeeze the information flow to a trickle. In both cases, their attempts have largely failed.

“It really illustrates the challenge that social media poses for systems that rely on an extremely tight control of information,” said Nicholas Bequelin, senior Asia researcher for Human Rights Watch and based in Hong Kong. “The erosion of information control is an enormous challenge for the party.”

July train crash

Even before Bo and Chen, an event on July 23 pointed to how pivotal microblogs had become. When two high-speed trains collided in Wenzhou, in Zhejiang province, killing 40, people immediately used their cellphones and tablets to take and post photos of the wreckage and the rescue efforts, long before the state-run media even acknowledged the crash.

When China’s censors ordered the state-run media not to report on the incident or the investigation, except for official pronouncements, most news about the causes and the ensuing investigation came from Weibo.

China has stepped up efforts to rein in the freewheeling Weibo culture, including implementing new rules requiring users to register with their real names and identity card numbers, so they can be more easily traced. Authorities have also clamped down on Weibo “rumor-mongering,” closing down at least 16 Web sites and arresting several people. The comment functions of the two most popular microblogging sites were temporarily disabled.

But Chinese “netizens” are constantly outpacing the censors.

Shortly after word of Chen’s escape emerged, for instance, authorities scrambled to limit what was known about him online, banning from Weibo search engines Chen’s name, his initials, “Blind Man,” and even code names such as “C-Guang-C.” But the censors went further, banning Weibo searches for his home city, Linyi, and his village, Dongshigu. Also banned were the movie titles that were being used as code words: “The Shawshank Redemption” and “The Great Escape.”

Chinese media finally broke its silence Friday, and four Beijing newspapers ran coordinated editorials attacking Chen and U.S. Ambassador Gary Locke for assisting him. But netizens again displayed their power.

Outraged readers bombarded the comment sections of the Beijing Daily, defending Locke and Chen. Soon, even “Beijing Daily” joined the list of banned search terms.

One of the newspapers, the Beijing News, even ran what appeared to be a contrite apology for its own editorial the next day.

In a Friday editorial, the paper wrote that “1.3 billion Chinese people cannot be fooled so easily.” It was referring to Chen and his supporters. But it may just as easily have been referring to the Communist Party’s propaganda machine.

Staff writer William Wan in Washington contributed to this report.

Loading...

Comments

Add your comment
 
Read what others are saying About Badges