In Egypt, anger grows among liberals over Islamist-backed constitution

CAIRO — Just hours after an Islamist-dominated assembly approved a new national constitution Friday morning, tens of thousands of protesters began pouring into Tahrir Square to say they objected to nearly everything about it.

They objected to the constitution-writing assembly itself, which they said was unrepresentative after liberal, secular and Christian members walked out. They objected to what they knew of the charter, which does not contain explicit protections for minority religions or women’s rights and which many referred to as the “Muslim Brotherhood constitution,” a reference to the Islamist backers of Egypt’s first democratically elected president, Mohamed Morsi.

Gallery

Demonstrations in Cairo: Protests continue in and around Tahrir Square against Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi’s declaration giving him nearly absolute power above judicial review.

Latest stories from Foreign

Before it falls through ice, Arctic research camp to close

Will Englund

Russian drift station threatened by rapid melt in Arctic Sea.

Moscow says Syrian government agrees ‘in principle’ to join talks

Will Englund and Loveday Morris

The Syrian Opposition Coalition is skeptical about the announcement, cites its ‘lack of clarity.’

Bombs, gunfire rock Afghan capital

Pamela Constable

Afghan police and insurgents wage a gun battle in a Kabul district that includes key government buildings.

Turkish trade undeterred by detours

Kevin Sullivan

Instead of crossing Syria, Turkey’s truckers now sail around it, driving home an age-old truth: In times of war, commerce improvises.

In Britain, Cameron faces conservative backlash

Anthony Faiola

After building a coalition by embracing liberal social issues, prime minister is challenged from the right.

And on the eighth day after Morsi decreed himself near-absolute powers in the name of preserving democratic gains, a disparate array of protesters chanted “down with Morsi” and other revolutionary slogans first uttered during the popular uprising that toppled Egypt’s longtime autocrat Hosni Mubarak nearly two year ago.

“I came down here to say no to the constitution and no to the constitutional declaration,” said Hanaa Sweries, a former teacher who was protesting in Tahrir Square for the first time Friday, referring to Morsi’s decree. “I knew from the start what he would do, but what is a surprise to me is that there are clashes so soon. I expected goodwill would last longer.”

And so it was that what was supposed to be a proud moment in the course of post-Mubarak Egypt — the birth of a new national charter to guide the path forward — degenerated into one more disappointment to liberals who seem ever more distrustful of Morsi and stunned at what their fragile democratic transition has wrought.

The constitution now goes to Morsi’s office. If he approves it, Morsi must call for a public referendum on the charter within the next two weeks.

On Friday, the State Department weighed in on the deepening political crisis, expressing concern over the “apparent lack of consensus during the drafting process.”

“If President Morsi approves this constitution, then the people of Egypt will have a chance via referendum to express their views on it,” said State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland. “So we would urge all Egyptians to participate actively in that, to review this draft to ensure it meets the highest standards of their aspirations to live in a country that respects universal human rights, that ensures that Egyptians of all stripes are protected under the law.”

The constitution, which was being changed and re-punctuated even as it was being voted on in a 13-hour session that stretched from Thursday into Friday morning, represents neither the worst fears nor the highest hopes of Egyptians.

It affirms that Egyptian law stems from “the principles of Islam,” for instance, but did not codify some of the strict moral codes that Morsi’s more fundamentalist Islamist backers wanted. The charter states that no law can limit the freedoms and rights set out in the constitution yet also says that the expression of those freedoms cannot undermine the “true nature of the family.” Freedom of religion is explicitly protected for Muslims, Christians and Jews, but not other religions.