Cameron defends himself to British Parliament over ties to phone-hacking scandal

LONDON — Prime Minister David Cameron defended himself in a combative session of Parliament on Wednesday over Britain’s phone-hacking scandal, as the opposition raucously questioned his judgment in hiring and associating with executives in Rupert Murdoch’s media empire who are now facing criminal charges.

Cameron cut short an official visit to Africa and flew home to answer questions from lawmakers about the scandal, whose gathering clouds have darkened his 15-month-old premiership. Normally supremely confident, the prime minister at times appeared exposed, declining to deny that he had discussed a major News Corp. business deal in Britain with its top executives. Although he admitted making errors in hindsight, he nevertheless seemed to stand his ground on key allegations and is set to benefit from Parliament’s summer recess, which will silence the House of Commons’ debate on the scandal until September.

Graphic

The sequence of events at News Corp.
Click Here to View Full Graphic Story

The sequence of events at News Corp.

Test your knowledge

Which of the following was the topic of the 2005 News of the World story that is credited with tipping off police to the possibility of voicemail hacking at the paper?

Question #1

Take the quiz

More on this Story

View all Items in this Story

Live Q&A, 11 a.m. ET

Murdoch’s next move

Ask Now

The parliamentary debate — at once highly confrontational, immensely personal and occasionally humorous, in the classic fashion of British politics — began just hours after the release of a committee report that accused Scotland Yard of a “catalogue of failures” in its original investigation into phone hacking.

The report also said News Corp. officials had engaged in “deliberate attempts to thwart investigations,” contradicting testimony by Murdoch and his son James Murdoch on Tuesday in which they said the company responded properly to phone hacking by the now-shuttered News of the World tabloid that affected thousands of British citizens.

On Wednesday, Cameron outlined the independent inquiry that will bring experts from the worlds of media, politics and law together for a far-reaching review of press and police corruption, with public hearings set to start this fall. The experts could recommend broad guidelines to limit cross-ownership of media in Britain and redefine the long-cozy rules of engagement for politicians and the press.

The scandal “has shaken people’s trust in the media and the legality of what they do, in the police and their ability to investigate media malpractice, and, yes, in politics and in politicians’ ability to get to grips with these issues,” Cameron said.

Such questions have swirled around Cameron himself. First and foremost, the prime minister is under fire for hiring Andy Coulson — a former News of the World editor — as his director of communications and keeping him on staff even as allegations against him mounted in the press. Coulson was arrested in connection with the scandal this month.

Blasting Cameron and his staff for repeatedly ignoring warnings about Coulson’s role in the hacking scandal, Ed Miliband, leader of the opposition Labor Party, said: “This can’t be put down to gross incompetence. It was a deliberate attempt to hide from the facts.”

Cameron conceded that he had erred in offering Coulson a job. “With 20-20 hindsight, I would not have offered the job,” he said.

Yet Cameron maintained that Coulson should be presumed “innocent until proven guilty,” and he said he would not offer a fuller apology to the nation unless Coulson is convicted. Cameron shot back that Miliband was seeking to distort the facts: “Stop hunting feeble conspiracy theories.”

Loading...

Comments

Add your comment
 
Read what others are saying About Badges