For Israel’s Netanyahu, cease-fire has benefits and risks

POOL/REUTERS - Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu gestures during his visit to the police headquarters in Jerusalem Nov. 22, 2012.

JERUSALEM — The domestic criticism started pouring in almost as soon as Israel’s cease-fire with Hamas was inked Wednesday night. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had waved a white flag and left the job unfinished, the opposition howled. A television snap poll found that a large majority of the public did not support the Egyptian-brokered truce.

Even so, many Israeli analysts said that for Netanyahu, a hawkish and shrewd politician who is seeking reelection in two months, the abrupt end to the eight-day hostilities in the Gaza Strip carried as many political benefits as risks. Although he has long vowed to safeguard Israel from terrorism, Gaza was never his battle. If the cease-fire holds — a major if — Netanyahu has several weeks to turn domestic and international focus back to his signature security issue: Iran.

Gallery

Latest stories from Foreign

Bombs, gunfire rock Afghan capital

Bombs, gunfire rock Afghan capital

Afghan police and insurgents wage a gun battle in a Kabul district that includes key government buildings.

Turkish trade undeterred by detours

Turkish trade undeterred by detours

Instead of crossing Syria, Turkey’s truckers now sail around it, driving home an age-old truth: In war, commerce improvises.

In Britain, Cameron faces conservative backlash

In Britain, Cameron faces conservative backlash

After building a coalition by embracing liberal social issues, prime minister is challenged from the right.

After years of economic decline, a new boom in Japan

After years of economic decline, a new boom in Japan

Under “Abenomics,” the prime minister’s radical economic policy plan, Japan sees signs of a revival.

Moscow says Syrian government agrees ‘in principle’ to join talks

Moscow says Syrian government agrees ‘in principle’ to join talks

The Syrian Opposition Coalition is skeptical about the announcement, cites its ‘lack of clarity.’

The Israeli operation did not devastate Gaza’s Hamas rulers; in fact, it emboldened them regionally. And there is broad agreement in Israel that stunting Gaza militants’ ability to launch rockets at Israel should have been a quicker mission. But letting it drag on further, analysts and officials said, would only benefit Iran.

A lingering, bloodier war probably would have distracted the international attention Netanyahu has worked to center on Iran’s nuclear program and would have eroded European and American support. The cease-fire, Israel seemed to bet, might inject goodwill into its shaky alliance with Egypt and Netanyahu’s chilly relations with President Obama.

“This is what a responsible government does, and it is what we did here: We made use of our military might while applying political considerations,” Netanyahu said Wednesday after the cease-fire was announced.

Israel appeared motivated to avoid the international censure that clouded its last Gaza operation four years ago. It launched about 10 times as many airstrikes this time but caused about 10 times fewer Palestinian deaths.

In an interview Thursday, a senior Israeli official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the politics of the military operation, argued that the Gaza offensive defied impressions of Netanyahu as a warmonger unconcerned about sparking regional conflict — the depiction offered by an array of ex-Israeli security officials opposed to an Israeli strike on Iran — and showcased “a responsible group here leading the country through a major crisis. . . . You didn’t see a group of extremists.”

Writing in the Jerusalem Post on Thursday, commentator Herb Keinon pronounced that as “the likely theme of [Netanyahu’s] campaign — military might with diplomatic prudence, restoring quiet, albeit temporarily, while retaining international legitimacy.” Although a cease-fire collapse could change his fortunes, Netanyahu is still viewed as the favorite in the coming elections.

During the Gaza operation, some Israeli observers surmised that it was launched partly to clear the decks for an attack on Iran — by destroying some of the weaponry Hamas might use to defend longtime sponsor Iran and by testing Israel’s U.S.-funded missile defense systems. The idea was echoed Wednesday before the cease-fire took hold by a senior Israeli military official, who told reporters that the offensive “was not only an event between us and Gaza. All the neighbors are looking . . . what is the Israeli performance here?”

Loading...

Comments

Add your comment
 
Read what others are saying About Badges