Senators demand secret memos on targeted killing

Eleven senators sent a letter to President Obama on Monday demanding access to secret legal memos outlining the administration’s case for the targeted killing of U.S. citizens in counterterrorism operations overseas.

The letter from eight Democrats and three Republicans contained the most forceful warning to date that lawmakers were considering blocking Obama’s nominees to run the CIA and Pentagon unless the memos are turned over.

Graphic

Click Here to View Full Graphic Story

More from PostPolitics

It's not just Republicans up in arms about Benghazi

It's not just Republicans up in arms about Benghazi

THE FIX | More than half of Americans say the Obama administration is trying to cover up the facts of the attack, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll.

IRS’s Lois Lerner to plead the Fifth

IRS’s Lois Lerner to plead the Fifth

The IRS official who first disclosed the agency's improper targeting of conservative groups will invoke her right not to incriminate herself.

Has anyone been ‘fired’ because of the Benghazi attacks?

Has anyone been ‘fired’ because of the  Benghazi attacks?

FACT CHECKER | Sen. Rand Paul claims no one has been fired because of the Benghazi attacks. So what happened to those State Department officials who lost their jobs?

Coburn: Tornado aid must be offset

Coburn: Tornado aid must be offset

Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) will insist that any federal aid to deal with the tornado in his home state must be offset by budget cuts.

Read more

The message comes three days before White House counterterrorism adviser John O. Brennan will face a confirmation hearing to become CIA director before the Senate intelligence committee. Former senator Chuck Hagel (R-Neb.) is awaiting a vote in the Senate Armed Services Committee following his hearing last week to become secretary of defense.

Cooperation with the request “will help avoid an unnecessary confrontation that could affect the Senate’s consideration of nominees for national security positions,” the letter said.

Three members of the intelligence panel signed the letter: Sens. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Mark Udall (D-Colo.) and Susan Collins (R-Maine).

In an interview, Wyden accused the administration of stonewalling. “The idea that the president has this extraordinary power that can be utilized in secret without any oversight or accountability, I think is wrong and detrimental to the public interest,” he said.

He stopped short of threatening to place a hold on Brennan’s nomination — a procedural step to prevent a vote.

Other lawmakers who signed the letter included Sen. Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.), the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Sen. Charles E. Grassley (Iowa), the ranking Republican on that panel.

Some key lawmakers did not sign, including Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), the chairman of the intelligence committee, who has indicated that she will support Brennan.

The request is the latest attempt to force the White House to turn over secret legal opinions that lay out the rationales for killing Americans accused of taking part in terrorism plots.

The administration has cited executive privilege and attorney-client relationship between the White House and the Justice Department, which produced the memos.

The administration has briefed lawmakers on the memos and summarized their contents in writing, congressional officials said. But Wyden said the refusal to furnish actual documents has made a “mockery” of congressional oversight.

The only U.S. citizen targeted under the new authority was Anwar al-Awlaki, a U.S.-born cleric accused of helping an al-Qaeda affiliate in Yemen carry out attacks against the United States. Three other Americans, including Awlaki’s teenage son, also have been killed in strikes but were not the primary targets.

In their letter, the senators said they don’t dispute that the president in extreme cases may need to use lethal force against Americans “just as President Lincoln had the authority to direct Union troops to fire upon Confederate forces.”

But the lawmakers cited the importance of having a “full understanding of how the executive branch interprets the limits and boundaries of this authority.”

Loading...

Comments

Add your comment
 
Read what others are saying About Badges