Prosecutors had asked for three years — the charge of hooliganism motivated by religious hatred carries a maximum of seven years — but after nearly three hours spent reading a summary of the trial from a red, leather-bound book, the judge said each woman would get two years. The case was so controversial that the judge’s face was not shown on the video feed for those who could not pack into the crowded courtroom. The defense said it would appeal the sentence.
The women, Nadezhda Tolokonnikova, 22, Maria Alekhina, 24, and Yekaterina Samutsevich, 30, have been in jail since March. They are members of a feminist collective called Pussy Riot and were relatively unknown singers and activists until their protests coincided with a rise in anti-government sentiment over the winter.
Now they have become an international cause, described as prisoners of conscience and caught up in a show trial reminiscent of the days of Stalinist repression. A sentence of time already served would have been seen as a sign of Kremlin tolerance for dissent; a sentence of three years or more would have been interpreted as an indication that Putin wants to put down all challenges to his presidency, no matter the cost.
But on Friday, the shorter sentence was slammed by rights groups as evidence that Russia was repressing dissent. And the United States expressed disappointment over the decision.
During his daily briefing, White House deputy press secretary Josh Earnest said, “While we understand the group’s behavior was offensive for some, we have concerns about the way these young women were treated by the Russian judicial system.”
Alexei Navalny, the crusading anti-corruption activist, wrote on his blog that though he believed the band’s stunt was foolish, “obviously, this unjust and cruel decision will increase anticlerical sentiment and aggressive criticism of the Russian Orthodox Church.”
Human Rights Watch released a statement from Hugh Williamson, the group’s Europe and Central Asia director. “It’s clear in this case that the women’s aim was to make a political statement, and it’s also clear that some found their actions offensive. But there is still a long way to go between an offensive political statement and a hate crime,” Williamson said. “The case against the Pussy Riot band members seems aimed not at protecting public order and security but at setting boundaries for political criticism.”
Loading...
Comments