By John H. Lacey
Robert B. Voas
James C. Fell
Pacific Institute for Research
and Evaluation
CALVERTON, Md. - In January 1995, a
bold national goal was established to
reduce alcohol-related traffic fatalities in
the United States to no more than 11,000
by the year 2005. A summit, involving
more than 150 partners, including government
leaders, legislators, judges, police,
citizen activists, industry groups and
researchers, resulted in 125 recommendations
to meet the goal.
This Partners in Progress effort led to a
national conference in 1997 to stimulate
effective actions at the state and local
level. Despite the activity, progress in
achieving this national public health goal
has been slow. Alcohol-related traffic fatalities
since the goal was established in
1995 have been reduced from 17,247 to
16,653 in 2000. If we continue at our current
rate of improvement we will come
nowhere near meeting the 11,000 by
2005. However, in the face of more cars,
drivers and miles driven, just holding the
line is an accomplishment.
In order to reduce alcohol-related
fatalities to no more than 11,000 by 2005,
progress must be achieved at a pace that
averages more than 1,100 fewer alcohol-related
fatalities year-to-year from 2000 to
2005. The average reduction from 1995 to
2000 was 119 fatalities. If certain measures
are instituted over the next few years,
"11,000 by 2005" can be achieved.
A combination of effective laws, highly
publicized enforcement, public information
and education, and practical alternatives to
drinking and driving are the keys to substantially
reducing the impaired driving
problem in this country.
If we are really serious about achieving
the goal by 2005, there are laws that can
be adopted and existing laws that can be
better implemented in every state;
enforcement programs that deter drinking
and driving in the first place; public information
campaigns to raise public consciousness;
and transportation alternatives
to make it easier for people to change
behavior. Based on what we know now, the
goal for 2005 can be achieved if we
aggressively implement certain strategies
at the state and local levels.
Specific laws when enacted, enforced
and publicized, have had dramatic effects
on alcohol-related crashes. These laws
include administrative license revocation
laws that empower officers to take drivers' licenses at the time of arrest rather
than after conviction; laws that lower the
legal blood alcohol concentration level
from .10 to .08; and zero tolerance laws
that prohibit driving with any alcohol by
persons under 21.
Key in the effort is strong enforcement.
Sobriety checkpoints are an effective
means of reducing alcohol-related crashes.
Efforts in Tennessee and New Mexico
reduced alcohol-related fatalities by as
much as 20 percent. In states where these
efforts have continued, the benefits have
been sustained. However, few state or
community police departments regularly
employ checkpoints.
Well publicized saturation patrols have
also been effective but they require considerable
manpower. The most effective
community drinking and driving enforcement
program should include both check-points
and saturation patrols.
If we are to achieve the goal of reducing
alcohol-related traffic deaths to 11,000
by 2005, it will take a renewed nationwide
commitment to the application of laws we
know work. This includes adopting them in
states that have not yet done so, and publicized
enforcement in all states to give the
laws teeth. What remains to be seen is
whether we have the political will to do so.
John H. Lacey, Robert B. Voas and James C.
Fell are senior researchers for the Pacific
Institute for Research and Evaluation, a
Calverton, Md.-based research and evaluation
non-profit that concentrates on preventive
health and safety issues including
impaired driving. PIRE's Web site is
www.pire.org.